Paper · 1979 · Crop Science

Growth Type and Yield Comparisons of Forage Species after Seed Multiplication in Germany and in the United States. II. Meadow Fescue, Timothy, and Perennial Ryegrass1

Uwe Simon; A. Kastenbauer

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seedlots of meadow rescue ( Festuca pratensis Huds.), timothy ( Phleum pratense L.), and perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perennial L.) were increased for two to four consecutive generations at one location in Germany and three locations in the United States. The population structure and forage yields of the original seed and advanced generations were investigated at Weihenstephan, Germany. All meadow rescue progenies were significantly taller and earlier and made better regrowth than the original seed. American lots and the corresponding German populations did not significantly differ in these characters. In timothy, variation of plant characteristics among locations and generations was neglegible. In perennial ryegrass, most progenies were significantly more vigorous in spring, earlier and taller than the original lot. American lots from lower latitudes were taller and earlier. The fourth subsequent generation from the most south. erly location, Shafter, Calif., headed 6 days earlier and grew 11 cm taller than the original lot. Percentage of seedling fluorescence of samples from the United States did not differ from the corresponding German progenies. There was no detrimental effect on dry‐matter forage yield due to seed multiplication in the United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All meadow fescue progenies from seed multiplication were significantly taller, earlier and regrew better than the original seed.

Taxon
meadow rescuee0
Treatment
Seed Multiplicationt0
Outcome
taller and earlier and made better regrowthe0
Direction
significantlye0
Comparator
the original seede0

Verbatim

t0

“Seed Multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“All meadow rescue progenies were significantly taller and earlier and made better regrowth than the original seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–502 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

American lots and the corresponding German populations of meadow fescue did not differ significantly in these characters.

Taxon
Meadow Fescuet0
Material
American lotse0
Outcome
these characterse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
German populationse0

Verbatim

t0

“Meadow Fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–132 · show in text ↑
e0

“American lots and the corresponding German populations did not significantly differ in these characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In timothy, variation of plant characteristics among locations and generations was negligible.

Taxon
timothyPhleum pratensee0
Outcome
variation of plant characteristicse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In timothy, variation of plant characteristics among locations and generations was neglegible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In perennial ryegrass most progenies were significantly more vigorous in spring, earlier and taller than the original lot.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Treatment
Seed Multiplicationt0
Outcome
more vigorous in spring, earlier and tallere0
Direction
significantlye0
Comparator
the original lote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Seed Multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77 · show in text ↑
e0

“In perennial ryegrass, most progenies were significantly more vigorous in spring, earlier and taller than the original lot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In perennial ryegrass American lots from lower latitudes were taller and earlier.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Material
American lots from lower latitudese0
Outcome
taller and earliere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–725 · show in text ↑
e0

“American lots from lower latitudes were taller and earlier”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–886 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fourth generation from the southernmost location headed 6 days earlier than the original perennial ryegrass lot.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Material
fourth subsequent generatione0
Outcome
headede0
Direction
earliere0
Value
6 dayse0
Comparator
the original lote0
Setting
Shafter, Calif.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–725 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fourth subsequent generation from the most south. erly location, Shafter, Calif., headed 6 days earlier and grew 11 cm taller than the original lot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1039 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fourth generation from the southernmost location grew 11 cm taller than the original perennial ryegrass lot.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee1
Material
fourth subsequent generatione0
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
tallere0
Value
11 cme0
Comparator
the original lote0
Setting
Shafter, Calif.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In perennial ryegrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–725 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fourth subsequent generation from the most south. erly location, Shafter, Calif., headed 6 days earlier and grew 11 cm taller than the original lot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1039 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling fluorescence percentage of US samples did not differ from the corresponding German progenies.

Taxon
Forage Speciest0
Outcome
Percentage of seedling fluorescencee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
the corresponding German progeniese0

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Percentage of seedling fluorescence of samples from the United States did not differ from the corresponding German progenies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed multiplication in the United States had no detrimental effect on dry-matter forage yield.

Taxon
Forage Speciest0
Treatment
seed multiplication in the United Statese0
Outcome
dry‐matter forage yielde0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Forage Species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no detrimental effect on dry‐matter forage yield due to seed multiplication in the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1273 · show in text ↑