Paper · 1974 · Pesticide Science

Effects of phorate placement on carrot fly control, seedling density and terminal residues in the crop

Frank E. Maskell; Robert Gair; John H. Williams; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The application of granules containing 10 % phorate at 1.12,2.24 or 4.48 kg a.i./ha in a narrow slit together with carrot seed significantly reduced seedling emergence in both a mineral and peat soil. When the granules were applied at 2.24 or 4.48 kg a.i./ha in a narrow slit 2.5 cm below the seed, seedling emergence was adversely affected only at the higher rate in the mineral soil. Phorate granules applied with the seed in the peat soil gave a significantly lower plant density than when applied below the seed, but subsequent carrot yields were unaffected because much larger roots were produced. All phorate treatments gave effective reduction of carrot fly larval damage to the roots. On the peat soil, there were significant increases in total phorate residues present in mature carrots with increasing rate of phorate granules placed with the seed. Placement of the granules 2.5 cm below the seed resulted in a 50% reduction in total residues of phorate in whole carrots compared with placing the granules with the seed. Residues resulting from 1.12 kg a.i./ha with the seed or 2.24 kg a.i./ha 2.5 cm below the seed were not significantly greater than residues in untreated carrots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phorate granules placed with seed reduced carrot seedling emergence in mineral and peat soil.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
granules containing 10 % phorate at 1.12,2.24 or 4.48 kg a.i./ha in a narrow slit together with carrot seede0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
a mineral and peat soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of granules containing 10 % phorate at 1.12,2.24 or 4.48 kg a.i./ha in a narrow slit together with carrot seed significantly reduced seedling emergence in both a mineral and peat soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 4.48 kg a.i./ha below the seed, carrot emergence was adversely affected in mineral soil.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
4.48 kg a.i./ha in a narrow slit 2.5 cm below the seede0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
adversely affectede0
Comparator
2.24e0
Setting
mineral soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the granules were applied at 2.24 or 4.48 kg a.i./ha in a narrow slit 2.5 cm below the seed, seedling emergence was adversely affected only at the higher rate in the mineral soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phorate placed with seed in peat soil produced lower carrot plant density than placement below seed.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Phorate granules applied with the seede0
Outcome
plant densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
when applied below the seede0
Setting
peat soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phorate granules applied with the seed in the peat soil gave a significantly lower plant density than when applied below the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–524 · show in text ↑
t0

“carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsequent carrot yields were unaffected by the placement difference.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Phorate granules applied with the seede0
Outcome
carrot yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Comparator
when applied below the seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phorate granules applied with the seed in the peat soil gave a significantly lower plant density than when applied below the seed, but subsequent carrot yields were unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larger carrot roots compensated for reduced plant density.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
larger rootse0
Direction
largere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“subsequent carrot yields were unaffected because much larger roots were produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All phorate treatments reduced carrot fly larval damage to carrot roots.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
All phorate treatmentse0
Interactor
carrot flyChamaepsila rosaee0pest
Outcome
carrot fly larval damage to the rootse0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chamaepsila rosae
Chamaepsila rosae · InteractorEmanuele Santarelli · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All phorate treatments gave effective reduction of carrot fly larval damage to the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–700 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phorate rate placed with carrot seed increased total residues in mature carrots on peat soil.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
phorate granules placed with the seede0
Outcome
total phorate residuese0
Direction
increasese0
Setting
peat soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the peat soil, there were significant increases in total phorate residues present in mature carrots with increasing rate of phorate granules placed with the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Placement below the seed reduced phorate residues in whole carrots by 50% versus placement with seed.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Placement of the granules 2.5 cm below the seede0
Outcome
total residues of phoratee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
placing the granules with the seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placement of the granules 2.5 cm below the seed resulted in a 50% reduction in total residues of phorate in whole carrots compared with placing the granules with the seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residues from 1.12 kg a.i./ha with seed were not significantly greater than untreated carrots.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
1.12 kg a.i./ha with the seede0
Outcome
Residuese0
Direction
not significantly greatere0
Comparator
untreated carrotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues resulting from 1.12 kg a.i./ha with the seed or 2.24 kg a.i./ha 2.5 cm below the seed were not significantly greater than residues in untreated carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residues from 2.24 kg a.i./ha below seed were not significantly greater than untreated carrots.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
2.24 kg a.i./ha 2.5 cm below the seede0
Outcome
Residuese0
Direction
not significantly greatere0
Comparator
untreated carrotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues resulting from 1.12 kg a.i./ha with the seed or 2.24 kg a.i./ha 2.5 cm below the seed were not significantly greater than residues in untreated carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1200 · show in text ↑

phorate · Chamaepsila rosae · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.