Paper · 1992 · Journal of Phytopathology

Wirkung der pflanzengesundheitsfördernden Rhizobakterien Agrobacterium radiobacter und Bacillus sphaerkus auf den Globodera pallida‐Befall der Kartoffel und das Pflanzenwachstum

J. Racke; R. A. Sikora

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Influence of the plant health‐promoting rhizobacteria Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus on Globodera pallida root infection of potato and subsequent plant growth The plant health‐promoting rhizobacteria (PHPR) Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’. In greenhouse tests the PHPR, sprayed individually, caused a significant reduction (p = 1 %) of approximately 41 % in nematode penetration whereas the blend had no effect on the infection process. Under field conditions the blend caused a significant (p = 1 %) 31 % and the treatment with B. sphaericus alone a significant (p = 1 %) 29 % reduction in penetration. Nematode reproduction was reduced significant by (p = 1 %) 51 % following application of B. sphaericus . The reduction in final cyst number detected in the field trials in the PHPR treatments was not statistically significant. Increased root growth was not observed in either the greenhouse or the field trials. However, tuber yield increased by 18 % and 22 % in the field trials when the tubers were treated with A. radiobacter or the blend, respectively. There was a significant increase (p = 5 %) of 38 % in the number of tubers per plant in the treatment with the blend. Zusammenfassung Die pflanzengesundheitsfördernden Rhizobakterien (PGFR) Agrobacterium radiobacter und Bacillus sphaericus sowie deren Mischungen wurden unter Gewächshaus‐ und Feldbedingungen in ihrer Wirkung auf den Globodera pallida ‐Befall der Kartoffelsorte Hansa untersucht. Die Einzelbehandlungen der PGFR bewirkten im Gewächshaus eine signifikante (p = 1%) ca. 41%ige Reduktion der Nematodeneindringung, während die Mischung beider Stämme keinen Einfluß zeigte. Im Freiland hemmte dagegen die Mischungsvariante den Befall signifikant (p = 1 %) um 31% und B. sphaericus signifikant (p = 1 %) um 29%. Die Nematodenvermehrung wurde im Gewächshaus durch B. sphaericus signifikant (p = 1 %) um ca. 51 % gemindert. Im Feld ermittelte Reduktionen der Zystenvermehrung nach Behandlung mit PGFR waren statistisch nicht abzusichern. Einflüsse der Bakterien auf das Wurzelwachstum konnten weder im Gewächshaus noch im Freiland festgestellt werden. Der im Freiland ermittelte Knollenertrag war durch A. radiobacter um ca. 18 % und durch die Mischung der Stämme um ca. 22 % erhöht. Die Anzahl der gebildeten Knollen pro Staude war an den mit beiden Bakterien inokulierten Pflanzen signifikant (p = 5 %) um 38 % höher.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrobacterium radiobacter applied individually significantly reduced greenhouse nematode penetration by approximately 41 %.

Material
Hansae0
Treatment
sprayed individuallye1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Second interactor
Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode penetratione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
approximately 41 %e1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Agrobacterium radiobacter · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant health‐promoting rhizobacteria (PHPR) Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“In greenhouse tests the PHPR, sprayed individually, caused a significant reduction (p = 1 %) of approximately 41 % in nematode penetration whereas the blend had no effect on the infection process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus sphaericus applied individually significantly reduced greenhouse nematode penetration by approximately 41 %.

Material
Hansae0
Treatment
sprayed individuallye1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus sphaericusLysinibacillus sphaericuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
nematode penetratione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
approximately 41 %e1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant health‐promoting rhizobacteria (PHPR) Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“In greenhouse tests the PHPR, sprayed individually, caused a significant reduction (p = 1 %) of approximately 41 % in nematode penetration whereas the blend had no effect on the infection process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial blend had no effect on greenhouse infection.

Treatment
blende1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Second interactor
Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infection processe1
Direction
no effecte1
Qualifier
Bacillus sphaericuse0
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Agrobacterium radiobacter · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“In greenhouse tests the PHPR, sprayed individually, caused a significant reduction (p = 1 %) of approximately 41 % in nematode penetration whereas the blend had no effect on the infection process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The blend significantly reduced field penetration by 31 %.

Treatment
blende1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Second interactor
Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetratione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
31 %e1
Qualifier
Bacillus sphaericuse0
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Agrobacterium radiobacter · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under field conditions the blend caused a significant (p = 1 %) 31 % and the treatment with B. sphaericus alone a significant (p = 1 %) 29 % reduction in penetration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. sphaericus alone significantly reduced field penetration by 29 %.

Treatment
treatment with B. sphaericus alonee1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Second interactor
B. sphaericusLysinibacillus sphaericuse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
penetratione1
Direction
reductione1
Value
29 %e1
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under field conditions the blend caused a significant (p = 1 %) 31 % and the treatment with B. sphaericus alone a significant (p = 1 %) 29 % reduction in penetration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. sphaericus significantly reduced nematode reproduction by 51 % in the greenhouse.

Treatment
application of B. sphaericuse1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Second interactor
B. sphaericusLysinibacillus sphaericuse1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Nematode reproductione1
Direction
reducede1
Value
51 %e1
Setting
Gewächshause2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nematode reproduction was reduced significant by (p = 1 %) 51 % following application of B. sphaericus .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–932 · show in text ↑
e2

“Die Nematodenvermehrung wurde im Gewächshaus durch B. sphaericus signifikant (p = 1 %) um ca. 51 % gemindert.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2008–2117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Final cyst number reductions in field PHPR treatments were not statistically significant.

Treatment
PHPR treatmentse1
Interactor
Globodera pallidaGlobodera pallidae0pathogen
Outcome
final cyst numbere1
Direction
reductione1
Qualifier
Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteriae0
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Globodera pallida
Globodera pallida · InteractorXiaohong Wang · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant health‐promoting rhizobacteria (PHPR) Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reduction in final cyst number detected in the field trials in the PHPR treatments was not statistically significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased root growth was not observed in greenhouse or field trials.

Treatment
PHPRe0
Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
not observede1
Qualifier
or the field trialse1
Setting
greenhousee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant health‐promoting rhizobacteria (PHPR) Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased root growth was not observed in either the greenhouse or the field trials.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. radiobacter tuber treatment increased field tuber yield by 18 %.

Treatment
treated with A. radiobactere1
Interactor
A. radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18 %e1
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Agrobacterium radiobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, tuber yield increased by 18 % and 22 % in the field trials when the tubers were treated with A. radiobacter or the blend, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The blend increased field tuber yield by 22 %.

Treatment
blende1
Interactor
Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Bacillus sphaericusLysinibacillus sphaericuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22 %e1
Setting
fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Agrobacterium radiobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, tuber yield increased by 18 % and 22 % in the field trials when the tubers were treated with A. radiobacter or the blend, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The blend significantly increased tuber number per plant by 38 %.

Treatment
treatment with the blende1
Interactor
Agrobacterium radiobacterAgrobacterium radiobactere0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Bacillus sphaericusLysinibacillus sphaericuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of tubers per plante1
Direction
increasee1
Value
38 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agrobacterium radiobacter
Agrobacterium radiobacter · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRobert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agrobacterium radiobacter and Bacillus sphaericus as well as a blend of both bacteria were tested under greenhouse and field conditions for their ability to reduce Globodera pallida root infection on the potato cultivar ‘Hansa’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–463 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a significant increase (p = 5 %) of 38 % in the number of tubers per plant in the treatment with the blend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1402 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Globodera pallida · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

application · Globodera pallida · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.