Paper · 1983 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Osmoregulation as a selection criterion for drought tolerance in wheat

JM Morgan

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
243
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A method is described in which measurements of osmoregulation made on glasshouse-grown wheat plants may be used to select lines which yield higher under conditions of water deficit in the field. The procedure involved growing F4 breeding lines in pots in a semi-controlled glasshouse. When the plants reached booting stage, they were transferred to a controlled environment chamber and droughted by withholding water. During the water deficit cycle approximately 10 flag leaf samples from each line were taken, and measurements were made of relative water content, osmotic potential and water potential. The lines were evaluated using estimates of the relative water content at either osmotic or water potential values of -2.5 MPa, after relationships between these measurements and relative water content had been established. The distribution of data into two main groups with a smaller intermediate group indicated possible single gene control. Under drought conditions in the field, lines selected from the high osmoregulating group maintained turgor to lower water potentials and gave grain yields which were 1.6 and 1.5 times greater than those selected from the low group at the F4 and F6 stages respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmoregulation data formed two main groups and a smaller intermediate group, suggesting possible single-gene control.

Outcome
distribution of data into two main groups with a smaller intermediate groupe0
Qualifier
possible single gene controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The distribution of data into two main groups with a smaller intermediate group indicated possible single gene control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected high-osmoregulating lines maintained turgor to lower water potentials under field drought.

Material
lines selected from the high osmoregulating groupe0
Outcome
turgore0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought conditions in the field, lines selected from the high osmoregulating group maintained turgor to lower water potentials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1080 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-osmoregulating F4 lines yielded 1.6 times the low group under field drought.

Material
lines selected from the high osmoregulating groupe1
Organ / stage
F4e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.6e0
Comparator
low groupe0
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave grain yields which were 1.6 and 1.5 times greater than those selected from the low group at the F4 and F6 stages respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought conditions in the field, lines selected from the high osmoregulating group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-osmoregulating F6 lines yielded 1.5 times the low group under field drought.

Material
lines selected from the high osmoregulating groupe1
Organ / stage
F6e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.5 timese0
Comparator
low groupe0
Setting
fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gave grain yields which were 1.6 and 1.5 times greater than those selected from the low group at the F4 and F6 stages respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under drought conditions in the field, lines selected from the high osmoregulating group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1036 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–99 · show in text ↑