Paper · 1994 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Suppression of Sclerotinia soft rot of lettuce with organic soil amendments

KN Asirifi; WC Morgan; DG Parbery

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The incidence of sclerotinia soft rot of lettuce and survival rate of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were reduced by the addition of organic amendments to field plots at the Frankston Research Station, Seaford, Vic. Of the 6 materials tested, stable manure, fowl manure, and lucerne hay were the best, and all except brown coal significantly reduced disease compared with control. Composting of the already mature materials (as supplied) made no difference to their effectiveness. Incorporating the amendments into soil increased the number (to 229% of the control) and fresh weight (to 202% of the control) of marketable lettuce. Stable manure provided the greatest number of marketable heads (270% of the control), while fowl manure gave the greatest increase in head weight per plot (268% of the control). These benefits were less evident following the first applications of amendments (experiment 1) than the second to the same soil plots (experiment 2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments reduced lettuce soft rot incidence.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of sclerotinia soft rote0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
Frankston Research Station, Seaford, Vic.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of sclerotinia soft rot of lettuce and survival rate of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were reduced by the addition of organic amendments to field plots at the Frankston Research Station, Seaford, Vic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments reduced S. sclerotiorum sclerotial survival in lettuce field plots.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
organic amendmentse0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
survival rate of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorume0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of sclerotinia soft rot of lettuce and survival rate of sclerotia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum were reduced by the addition of organic amendments to field plots at the Frankston Research Station, Seaford, Vic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All amendments except brown coal significantly reduced lettuce disease compared with control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
all except brown coale0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all except brown coal significantly reduced disease compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stable manure, fowl manure and lucerne hay were the best of six amendments for disease control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
were the beste0
Value
6 materialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the 6 materials tested, stable manure, fowl manure, and lucerne hay were the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–307 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composting the mature amendments did not change their effectiveness.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Composting of the already mature materialse0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
made no differencee0
Comparator
as suppliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Composting of the already mature materials (as supplied) made no difference to their effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment incorporation raised marketable lettuce number to 229% of control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Incorporating the amendments into soile0
Outcome
numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
229% of the controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporating the amendments into soil increased the number (to 229% of the control) and fresh weight (to 202% of the control) of marketable lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment incorporation raised marketable lettuce fresh weight to 202% of control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Incorporating the amendments into soile0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
202% of the controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporating the amendments into soil increased the number (to 229% of the control) and fresh weight (to 202% of the control) of marketable lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stable manure gave the greatest number of marketable lettuce heads, 270% of control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Stable manuree0
Outcome
number of marketable headse0
Direction
greateste0
Value
270% of the controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stable manure provided the greatest number of marketable heads (270% of the control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fowl manure produced the greatest increase in lettuce head weight per plot, 268% of control.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
fowl manuree0
Outcome
head weight per plote0
Direction
greatest increasee0
Value
268% of the controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fowl manure gave the greatest increase in head weight per plot (268% of the control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benefits of amendments were less evident after first than second application to the same soil plots.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
first applications of amendmentse0
Outcome
benefitse0
Direction
less evidente0
Comparator
second to the same soil plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These benefits were less evident following the first applications of amendments (experiment 1) than the second to the same soil plots (experiment 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

other · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 66 positive, 12 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

249 papers: 213 positive, 36 negative or no effect

212 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

245 papers more in this group

See all 249 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.