Paper · 2009

Suppression of lettuce drop caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in the field using municipal solid waste compost and fungistatic effect of water extract.

E. Lahoz; R. Caiazzo; Luigi Morra; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary is the principal etiological agent of lettuce drop in Italy and worldwide. The objectives of this study were: i) to evaluate the efficacy of source-separated municipal waste compost when used as fertilizer at a rate of 25 t ha -1 on a dry matter basis in suppressing S. sclerotiorum on lettuce; ii) to investigate the effect of compost water extract on myceliogenic germination of sclerotia; iii) to determine the effect of water extract on 6 pathogens of lettuce. In order to achieve these objectives, two lettuce crop cycles in open fields, two fungal bioassays and soil assays of sclerotial content in the laboratory were carried out in 2008. Results demonstrated that the incidence of S. sclerotiorum in open fields was significantly lower in compost than in mineral fertilized plots (-31% in average). Marketable yield was significantly higher for compost amended plots than those mineral fertilized (+ 6.5 t ha -1 in average). No variation in soil population of the pathogen was observed. Sterile water extract from mature compost was able to inhibit growth of S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 with IC50 values of 308 and 438 mg l -1 respectively, while it was not effective toward four other pathogens tested, including R. solani AG 1. S. sclerotiorum myceliogenic germination of sclerotia was also affected by water extract. Fungistasis could be one of the possible mechanisms of action, but this hypothesis does not imply that biological rather than physical mechanisms should act contemporary. Water extract of mature compost demonstrated the potential for extraction of active molecules. In addition, the extract was not phytotoxic, as reported for certain immature compost teas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost reduced field S. sclerotiorum incidence relative to mineral fertilizer by 31%.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
composte0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of S. sclerotiorume0
Direction
lowere0
Value
-31%e0
Comparator
mineral fertilized plotse0
Setting
open fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results demonstrated that the incidence of S. sclerotiorum in open fields was significantly lower in compost than in mineral fertilized plots (-31% in average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased marketable lettuce yield relative to mineral fertilizer by 6.5 t ha -1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
compost amended plotse0
Outcome
Marketable yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.5 t ha -1e0
Comparator
mineral fertilizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yield was significantly higher for compost amended plots than those mineral fertilized (+ 6.5 t ha -1 in average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost did not change the soil population of the lettuce pathogen.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
composte2
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume1pathogen
Outcome
soil population of the pathogene0
Direction
No variatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No variation in soil population of the pathogen was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1033 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary is the principal etiological agent of lettuce drop in Italy and worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results demonstrated that the incidence of S. sclerotiorum in open fields was significantly lower in compost than in mineral fertilized plots (-31% in average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sterile mature compost water extract inhibited S. sclerotiorum growth at an IC50 of 308 mg l -1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Sterile water extract from mature composte0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
growth of S. sclerotiorume0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
308e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sterile water extract from mature compost was able to inhibit growth of S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 with IC50 values of 308 and 438 mg l -1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sterile mature compost water extract inhibited Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 growth at an IC50 of 438 mg l -1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Sterile water extract from mature composte0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-1e0pathogen
Outcome
growth of S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1e0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
438 mg l -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sterile water extract from mature compost was able to inhibit growth of S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 with IC50 values of 308 and 438 mg l -1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract was ineffective against four other lettuce pathogens, including R. solani AG 1.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
water extracte1
Interactor
R. solani AG 1Rhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
four other pathogens tested, including R. solani AG 1e0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was not effective toward four other pathogens tested, including R. solani AG 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sterile water extract from mature compost was able to inhibit growth of S. sclerotiorum and Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 with IC50 values of 308 and 438 mg l -1 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost water extract affected S. sclerotiorum sclerotial myceliogenic germination.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
water extracte0
Interactor
S. sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0pathogen
Outcome
S. sclerotiorum myceliogenic germination of sclerotiae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. sclerotiorum myceliogenic germination of sclerotia was also affected by water extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1384 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose fungistasis as a possible mechanism of compost action.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Fungistasise0
Qualifier
possible mechanisms of actione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungistasis could be one of the possible mechanisms of action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature compost water extract was not phytotoxic to lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
extracte0
Outcome
not phytotoxice0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the extract was not phytotoxic, as reported for certain immature compost teas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mature compost water extract showed potential for extraction of active molecules.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
potential for extraction of active moleculese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water extract of mature compost demonstrated the potential for extraction of active molecules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1650 · show in text ↑
t0

“lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑

botanical · Rhizoctonia solani · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 6 positive, 15 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.