Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Breakeven Cost of Irrigating Bermudagrass, Tall Fescue, and Orchardgrass Hay Production in Tennessee

Xia “Vivian” Zhou; Christopher N. Boyer; James A. Larson; et al.

10
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Little is known about the economic feasibility of irrigating cool‐ and warm‐season grass species for hay production in the southeastern United States. The objective of this study was to determine the breakeven cost of irrigating bermudagrass [ Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], tall fescue [ Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort., formerly Festuca arundinacea Schreb.], and orchardgrass ( Dactylis glomerata L.) for hay production in Tennessee. Yield response to three irrigation levels during three harvest periods was estimated for the three grass species using data obtained from a 5‐yr study in a mixed model analysis. Partial budgets were developed to calculate annual net returns for irrigated and unirrigated hay production and to calculate the annual breakeven cost of irrigation for each grass. Orchardgrass and tall fescue hay yields negatively responded to irrigation during the spring harvest but positively responded for the summer and fall harvests. Similarly, bermudagrass hay yield positively responded to irrigation during the summer and fall harvests. For all three grass species, hay yield was greatest at the highest irrigation level (3.05 cm wk −1 ) during the fall harvest only. The breakeven costs of irrigation for hay production ranged between US$59 and US$87 ha −1 for orchardgrass, between US$66 and US$136 ha −1 for tall fescue, and between US$222 and US$335 ha −1 for bermudagrass. Results suggest that a producer would be more likely to increase net returns by irrigating bermudagrass than irrigating cool‐season grass species in the southeastern United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orchardgrass spring hay yield decreased with irrigation.

Taxon
OrchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0
Organ / stage
spring harveste0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
hay yieldse0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orchardgrass and tall fescue hay yields negatively responded to irrigation during the spring harvest but positively responded for the summer and fall harvests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall fescue spring hay yield decreased with irrigation.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Organ / stage
spring harveste0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
hay yieldse0
Direction
negativelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orchardgrass and tall fescue hay yields negatively responded to irrigation during the spring harvest but positively responded for the summer and fall harvests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orchardgrass summer and fall hay yield increased with irrigation.

Taxon
OrchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
hay yieldse0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
summer and fall harvestse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orchardgrass and tall fescue hay yields negatively responded to irrigation during the spring harvest but positively responded for the summer and fall harvests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall fescue summer and fall hay yield increased with irrigation.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
hay yieldse0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
summer and fall harvestse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Orchardgrass and tall fescue hay yields negatively responded to irrigation during the spring harvest but positively responded for the summer and fall harvests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bermudagrass summer and fall yield increased with irrigation.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
hay yielde0
Direction
positivelye0
Qualifier
summer and fall harvestse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bermudagrass hay yield positively responded to irrigation during the summer and fall harvests.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three grasses had greatest fall yield at the highest irrigation rate.

Taxon
all three grass speciese0
Treatment
highest irrigation level (3.05 cm wk −1 )e0
Outcome
hay yielde0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
fall harvest onlye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For all three grass species, hay yield was greatest at the highest irrigation level (3.05 cm wk −1 ) during the fall harvest only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orchardgrass irrigation breakeven costs ranged from US$59 to US$87 per hectare.

Taxon
orchardgrassDactylis glomeratae0
Outcome
breakeven costs of irrigation for hay productione0
Value
US$59 and US$87 ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylis glomerata
Dactylis glomerata · TaxonW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“breakeven costs of irrigation for hay production ranged between US$59 and US$87 ha −1 for orchardgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tall fescue irrigation breakeven costs ranged from US$66 to US$136 per hectare.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Outcome
breakeven costs of irrigation for hay productione1
Value
US$66 and US$136 ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between US$66 and US$136 ha −1 for tall fescue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1356 · show in text ↑
e1

“breakeven costs of irrigation for hay production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bermudagrass irrigation breakeven costs ranged from US$222 to US$335 per hectare.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone0
Outcome
breakeven costs of irrigation for hay productione1
Value
US$222 and US$335 ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between US$222 and US$335 ha −1 for bermudagrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“breakeven costs of irrigation for hay production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1254 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude bermudagrass irrigation is more likely to increase net returns than cool-season grass irrigation.

Taxon
bermudagrassCynodon dactylone0
Outcome
increase net returns by irrigating bermudagrasse0
Comparator
cool‐season grass speciese0
Setting
southeastern United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cynodon dactylon
Cynodon dactylon · TaxonRobert Flogaus-Faust · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a producer would be more likely to increase net returns by irrigating bermudagrass than irrigating cool‐season grass species in the southeastern United States.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1592 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Dactylis glomerata (cocksfoot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · yield · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.