Paper · 2008 · Experimental Agriculture

INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT OF PEARL MILLET IN THE SAHEL COMBINING CATTLE MANURE, CROP RESIDUE AND MINERAL FERTILIZER

PIERRE B. I. AKPONIKPE; KARLHEINZ MICHELS; CHARLES L. BIELDERS

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
49
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY In the Sahelian zone of Niger, there is a need to develop guidelines for integrated nutrient management, which relies on the potential nutrient sources of manure, pearl millet residue and mineral fertilizers. A fully factorial on-station experiment was conducted during the 1994 and 1995 rainy seasons at Sadoré, Niger, combining application of: (i) broadcast millet residue (300, 900 and 2700 kg ha −1 ), (ii) broadcast cattle manure (300, 900 and 2700 kg ha −1 ) and (iii) mineral fertilizer (unfertilized control, 15 kg N ha −1 + 4.4 kg P ha −1 and 45 kg N ha −1 + 13.1 kg P ha −1 ). Manure and fertilizer increased millet yields in both years whereas residue was effective in 1995 only. The effect of manure and residue were additive, as was the effect of manure and fertilizer but only up to 50 kg N ha −1 . However in 1995, the response to fertilizer was approximately doubled in the presence of 900 or 2700 kg residue ha −1 compared to fertilizer with 300 kg ha −1 residue, indicating a strong synergistic effect. This synergistic effect was reflected in the partial factor productivity of nitrogen and phosphorous in both years. Two treatment combinations stand out as particularly relevant based on yield, partial factor productivity and nutrient balance criteria: 2700 kg manure ha −1 combined with (i) 300 kg residue and no fertilizer (95% grain yield increase); (ii) 900 kg residue ha −1 and 15 kg N + 4 kg P ha −1 (132% grain yield increase). There is a need for similar, long-term experiments to confirm the present results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure increased pearl millet yields in both years.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
millet yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both yearse0
Setting
Sadoré, Nigere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure and fertilizer increased millet yields in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
e2

“A fully factorial on-station experiment was conducted during the 1994 and 1995 rainy seasons at Sadoré, Niger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer increased pearl millet yields in both years relative to the unfertilized control.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
mineral fertilizere2
Outcome
millet yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both yearse0
Comparator
unfertilized controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure and fertilizer increased millet yields in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
e2

“(iii) mineral fertilizer (unfertilized control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Millet residue increased pearl millet yields in 1995 only.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
millet residuee7
Outcome
millet yieldse0
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Qualifier
in 1995 onlye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Manure and fertilizer increased millet yields in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–654 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas residue was effective in 1995 only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–697 · show in text ↑
e7

“(i) broadcast millet residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 354–382 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of manure and residue on pearl millet was additive.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
effect of manure and residuee6
Qualifier
additivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effect of manure and residue were additive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–745 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of manure and mineral fertilizer on pearl millet was additive only up to 50 kg N ha −1.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
effect of manure and fertilizere7
Qualifier
only up to 50 kg N ha −1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e7

“as was the effect of manure and fertilizer but only up to 50 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1995 the response to fertilizer was approximately doubled in the presence of 900 or 2700 kg residue ha −1 compared with fertilizer with 300 kg ha −1 residue.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
900 or 2700 kg residue ha −1e1
Outcome
response to fertilizere1
Direction
approximately doublede1
Qualifier
in 1995e1
Comparator
fertilizer with 300 kg ha −1 residuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“However in 1995, the response to fertilizer was approximately doubled in the presence of 900 or 2700 kg residue ha −1 compared to fertilizer with 300 kg ha −1 residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–987 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue and fertilizer had a strong synergistic effect on pearl millet response.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
residuee1
Outcome
synergistic effecte2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e2

“indicating a strong synergistic effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“However in 1995, the response to fertilizer was approximately doubled in the presence of 900 or 2700 kg residue ha −1 compared to fertilizer with 300 kg ha −1 residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The synergistic effect was reflected in partial factor productivity of nitrogen and phosphorous in both years.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Outcome
partial factor productivity of nitrogen and phosphorouse3
Qualifier
in both yearse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e3

“This synergistic effect was reflected in the partial factor productivity of nitrogen and phosphorous in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 2700 kg manure ha −1 with 300 kg residue and no fertilizer increased grain yield by 95%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
2700 kg manure ha −1 combined with (i) 300 kg residue and no fertilizere4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
95%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“2700 kg manure ha −1 combined with (i) 300 kg residue and no fertilizer (95% grain yield increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining 900 kg residue ha −1 with 15 kg N + 4 kg P ha −1 increased grain yield by 132%.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
900 kg residue ha −1 and 15 kg N + 4 kg P ha −1e5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Value
132%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PEARL MILLET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“(ii) 900 kg residue ha −1 and 15 kg N + 4 kg P ha −1 (132% grain yield increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1462 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 144 positive, 6 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

255 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.