Paper · 1995 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Tillage effect on root rot severity, growth and yield of beans

C. S. Tan; J. C. Tu

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of soil tillage on plant growth, yield and root rot severity of beans was investigated in field plots with and without root rot infestation in 1992 and 1993. There was a significant reduction in root rot severity, and an increase in plant dry weight and yield in the root-rot-infested soils with deep tillage in both years. Deep tillage also significantly increased plant dry weight and yield in the non-root-rot soils in a dry year. The resistant cultivar (A300) had significantly less root rot damage than the susceptible cultivar (Harowood) in both root rot and non-root rot infested soils. Significant differences in plant dry weight and yield in relation to cultivars were not detected. Therefore, deep tillage can reduce soil compaction and increase yield of beans and reduce root rot severity. Key words:Phaseolus vulgaris L., deep tillage, fusarium root rot, rhizoctonia root rot, yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage significantly reduces bean root rot severity in root-rot-infested soils

Taxon
beanst0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
root rot severitye0
Direction
reductione0
Setting
root-rot-infested soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“yield of beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was a significant reduction in root rot severity, and an increase in plant dry weight and yield in the root-rot-infested soils with deep tillage in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increases bean plant dry weight and yield in root-rot-infested soils in both years

Taxon
beanst0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
plant dry weight and yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
root-rot-infested soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“yield of beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was a significant reduction in root rot severity, and an increase in plant dry weight and yield in the root-rot-infested soils with deep tillage in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage significantly increases bean plant dry weight and yield in non-root-rot soils in a dry year

Taxon
beanst0
Treatment
Deep tillagee1
Outcome
plant dry weight and yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in a dry yeare1
Setting
non-root-rot soilse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“yield of beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Deep tillage also significantly increased plant dry weight and yield in the non-root-rot soils in a dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–443 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The resistant bean cultivar A300 has significantly less root rot damage than the susceptible cultivar Harowood

Taxon
beanst0
Material
A300e2
Outcome
root rot damagee2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
Harowoode2

Verbatim

t0

“yield of beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“The resistant cultivar (A300) had significantly less root rot damage than the susceptible cultivar (Harowood) in both root rot and non-root rot infested soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–603 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean plant dry weight and yield do not differ among cultivars

Taxon
beanst0
Material
cultivarse3
Outcome
plant dry weight and yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Verbatim

t0

“yield of beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“Significant differences in plant dry weight and yield in relation to cultivars were not detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–701 · show in text ↑

tillage · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

tillage · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 41 positive, 23 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.