Abstract
Field pea has been shown to benefit from the use of rhizobium inoculation and seed-applied fungicides under intensive production. The objective of this research was to determine the effect of seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production on fields with no previous history of the crop. The study was conducted at seven locations in Saskatchewan in each of 2 yr. Fungicide treatments were Apron FL (metalaxyl), Apron FL + Thiram 75WP (dithiocarbamate) and an untreated check in 1997 and a fourth treatment, Thiram 75WP, was added in 1998. Rhizobium treatments were seed-applied liquid inoculant, soil-applied granular inoculant and a non-inoculated check. Inoculation with rhizobium increased nodulation (5 of 10 sites), seed yield (6 of 13 sites), and protein content (3 of 8 sites), but occasionally appeared to reduce emergence (3 of 14 sites). Granular inoculant had more beneficial effects than the liquid inoculant. Fungicide treatments had few positive effects on production, and occasionally negative effects such as reduced emergence. Interaction effects were rare between seed-applied fungicide and seed-applied liquid or soil-applied granular rhizobium inoculants, which indicated compatibility of these products. Variability in the effects of inoculant types and fungicides suggests that responses are dependent on local soil and environmental conditions. Key words: Apron (metalaxyl), Thiram (dithiocarbamate), Pisum sativum, zero tillage
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased nodulation at 5 of 10 sites.
- Taxon
- field peae6
- Material
- Carnevale6
- Treatment
- Inoculation with rhizobiume1
- Interactor
- Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaeRhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaee6symbiont
- Outcome
- nodulatione1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 5 of 10 sitese1
- Setting
- seven locations in Saskatchewane0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The study was conducted at seven locations in Saskatchewan in each of 2 yr”
e1“Inoculation with rhizobium increased nodulation (5 of 10 sites), seed yield (6 of 13 sites), and protein content (3 of 8 sites), but occasionally appeared to reduce emergence (3 of 14 sites)”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased seed yield at 6 of 13 sites.
- Taxon
- field peae6
- Material
- Carnevale6
- Treatment
- Inoculation with rhizobiume1
- Interactor
- Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaeRhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaee6symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 6 of 13 sitese1
- Setting
- seven locations in Saskatchewane0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The study was conducted at seven locations in Saskatchewan in each of 2 yr”
e1“Inoculation with rhizobium increased nodulation (5 of 10 sites), seed yield (6 of 13 sites), and protein content (3 of 8 sites), but occasionally appeared to reduce emergence (3 of 14 sites)”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased protein content at 3 of 8 sites.
- Taxon
- field peae6
- Material
- Carnevale6
- Treatment
- Inoculation with rhizobiume1
- Interactor
- Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaeRhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaee6symbiont
- Outcome
- protein contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 3 of 8 sitese1
- Setting
- seven locations in Saskatchewane0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The study was conducted at seven locations in Saskatchewan in each of 2 yr”
e1“Inoculation with rhizobium increased nodulation (5 of 10 sites), seed yield (6 of 13 sites), and protein content (3 of 8 sites), but occasionally appeared to reduce emergence (3 of 14 sites)”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation occasionally appeared to reduce emergence, at 3 of 14 sites.
- Taxon
- field peae6
- Treatment
- Inoculation with rhizobiume1
- Interactor
- Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaeRhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciaee6symbiont
- Outcome
- emergencee1
- Direction
- reducee1
- Value
- 3 of 14 sitese1
- Qualifier
- occasionally appeared toe1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Inoculation with rhizobium increased nodulation (5 of 10 sites), seed yield (6 of 13 sites), and protein content (3 of 8 sites), but occasionally appeared to reduce emergence (3 of 14 sites)”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Granular rhizobium inoculant had more beneficial effects than liquid inoculant.
Verbatim
e2“Granular inoculant had more beneficial effects than the liquid inoculant.”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide treatments had few positive effects on field pea production.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“Fungicide treatments had few positive effects on production, and occasionally negative effects such as reduced emergence.”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicide treatments occasionally had negative effects on field pea, such as reduced emergence.
- Taxon
- field peae6
- Treatment
- Fungicide treatmentse3
- Outcome
- emergencee3
- Direction
- reducede3
- Qualifier
- occasionallye3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e3“Fungicide treatments had few positive effects on production, and occasionally negative effects such as reduced emergence.”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Interaction effects between seed-applied fungicide and rhizobium inoculants were rare, indicating compatibility.
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Interaction effects were rare between seed-applied fungicide and seed-applied liquid or soil-applied granular rhizobium inoculants, which indicated compatibility of these products.”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
Claim · model-written summary
Responses to inoculant types and fungicides depend on local soil and environmental conditions.
- Taxon
- field peae6
- Outcome
- effects of inoculant types and fungicidese5
- Setting
- local soil and environmental conditionse5
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e5“Variability in the effects of inoculant types and fungicides suggests that responses are dependent on local soil and environmental conditions.”
e6“seed- or soil-applied rhizobium (Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae) inoculants and seed-applied fungicides on field pea (Pisum sativum “Carneval”) production”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fungicide · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fungicide · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.