Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at the experimental field of Kyushu University, northern Kyushu in 1996 and 1997 to investigate the possibility of a double cropping of sorghum using early maturity cultivars. The effects of sowing date (early or late) and the cultivar on the yield were also examined. On the average, grain yield from double cropping was 556 g m−2 in 1996 and 746 g m−2 in 1997. Sowing date greatly influenced the major traits of the summer crop, but not significantly those in the spring crop, except for the days to heading. Late summer sowing decreased grain yield as much as 41.9%, decreased 100-grain weight by 22.4% and extended days to heading. Early sowing, early in April and late in July or early in August, is recommended for spring and summer crops, respectively, in a double cropping system to obtain a high grain yield. SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Double cropping gave a grain yield of 556 g m−2 in 1996.
- Outcome
- grain yield from double croppinge1
- Value
- 556 g m−2e1
- Setting
- experimental field of Kyushu University, northern Kyushue0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Field experiments were conducted at the experimental field of Kyushu University, northern Kyushu in 1996 and 1997”
e1“grain yield from double cropping was 556 g m−2 in 1996 and 746 g m−2 in 1997”
Claim · model-written summary
Double cropping gave a grain yield of 746 g m−2 in 1997.
- Outcome
- grain yield from double croppinge1
- Value
- 746 g m−2e1
- Setting
- experimental field of Kyushu University, northern Kyushue0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Field experiments were conducted at the experimental field of Kyushu University, northern Kyushu in 1996 and 1997”
e1“grain yield from double cropping was 556 g m−2 in 1996 and 746 g m−2 in 1997”
Claim · model-written summary
Late summer sowing decreased grain yield of double-cropped sorghum by as much as 41.9%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Late summer sowing decreased grain yield as much as 41.9%, decreased 100-grain weight by 22.4% and extended days to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
Late summer sowing decreased 100-grain weight of double-cropped sorghum by 22.4%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Late summer sowing decreased grain yield as much as 41.9%, decreased 100-grain weight by 22.4% and extended days to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
Late summer sowing extended days to heading of double-cropped sorghum.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Late summer sowing decreased grain yield as much as 41.9%, decreased 100-grain weight by 22.4% and extended days to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date greatly influenced the major traits of the summer sorghum crop.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Sowing date greatly influenced the major traits of the summer crop, but not significantly those in the spring crop, except for the days to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date did not significantly influence the traits of the spring sorghum crop.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Sowing date greatly influenced the major traits of the summer crop, but not significantly those in the spring crop, except for the days to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date influenced days to heading of the spring sorghum crop.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Sowing date greatly influenced the major traits of the summer crop, but not significantly those in the spring crop, except for the days to heading”
Claim · model-written summary
Early sowing is recommended for spring and summer sorghum crops in a double cropping system to obtain a high grain yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“Early sowing, early in April and late in July or early in August, is recommended for spring and summer crops, respectively, in a double cropping system to obtain a high grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
SA 403 was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
D12 was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
C8 was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
C9 was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
D5 was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
The C10-1 F4 line was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
The D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) was considered suitable for a double cropping system.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grain Yield of Sorghum Cultivars”
e0“SA 403, D12, C8, C9, D5 C10-1 F4 line and D5 × C8 (F1 hybrid) were considered to be suitable for a double cropping system”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
67 papers more in this group
See all 71 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.