Paper · 2011 · Agronomy Journal

Planting Date Affects Biomass and Brix of Sweet Sorghum Grown for Biofuel across Florida

J. E. Erickson; Z. R. Helsel; K. R. Woodard; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sweet sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a potential bioenergy crop that is capable of high biomass and sugar yields, but production for biofuel in the Southeast is not well understood. The present study examined the effects of planting date (three dates from mid‐March to mid‐June) on primary and ratoon crop fresh biomass, brix, and estimated sugar yield of three sweet sorghum cultivars (‘Dale’, ‘Topper 76‐6’, and ‘M‐81E’) grown at three sites from North (29°24′ N) to South Florida (26°40′ N). Across all treatments, primary crop fresh biomass, brix and estimated sugar yields were 70 Mg ha −1 , 148 g kg −1 , and 5.69 Mg ha −1 , respectively. Primary crop yields were greatest for the two earliest planting dates (mid‐March to mid‐May), and for our southernmost site. The yield potential for ratoon crops was in general only about half as much as the primary crop across all years, sites, and cultivars for the earliest planting date. An exception, however, was ratoon crop yields at the southernmost site, which were in some cases equal to or greater than primary crop yields. Low primary crop brix values were found for all cultivars on the muck soils in South Florida compared to the other two sites, and for M‐81E compared to Dale and Topper 76‐6. These low brix values were correlated with greater fresh biomass production. Further research is needed on planting dates for optimizing primary and ratoon crop yields along with varietal development with improved ratoon crop yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary crop fresh biomass averaged 70 Mg ha −1 across treatments.

Taxon
primary crope0
Outcome
fresh biomasse0
Value
70 Mg ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Across all treatments, primary crop fresh biomass, brix and estimated sugar yields were 70 Mg ha −1 , 148 g kg −1 , and 5.69 Mg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary crop brix averaged 148 g kg −1 across treatments.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
brixe0
Value
148 g kg −1e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Across all treatments, primary crop fresh biomass, brix and estimated sugar yields were 70 Mg ha −1 , 148 g kg −1 , and 5.69 Mg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Estimated primary crop sugar yield averaged 5.69 Mg ha −1.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
estimated sugar yieldse0
Value
5.69 Mg ha −1e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Across all treatments, primary crop fresh biomass, brix and estimated sugar yields were 70 Mg ha −1 , 148 g kg −1 , and 5.69 Mg ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary crop yield was greatest at the two earliest planting dates.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Treatment
two earliest planting datese0
Outcome
Primary crop yieldse0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
mid‐March to mid‐Maye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Primary crop yields were greatest for the two earliest planting dates (mid‐March to mid‐May), and for our southernmost site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–780 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary crop yield was greatest at the southernmost site.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
Primary crop yieldse0
Direction
greateste0
Setting
southernmost sitee0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Primary crop yields were greatest for the two earliest planting dates (mid‐March to mid‐May), and for our southernmost site.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–780 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon yield was generally about half primary crop yield at the earliest planting date.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
yield potential for ratoon cropse0
Direction
half as muche0
Value
about halfe0
Qualifier
earliest planting datee0
Comparator
primary crope0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yield potential for ratoon crops was in general only about half as much as the primary crop across all years, sites, and cultivars for the earliest planting date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–947 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the southernmost site, ratoon yields sometimes equaled or exceeded primary yields.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
ratoon crop yieldse0
Direction
equal to or greater thane0
Comparator
primary crop yieldse0
Setting
southernmost sitee0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“An exception, however, was ratoon crop yields at the southernmost site, which were in some cases equal to or greater than primary crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1090 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cultivars had lower brix on South Florida muck soils than at the other sites.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
primary crop brix valuese0
Direction
Lowe0
Comparator
other two sitese0
Setting
muck soils in South Floridae0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low primary crop brix values were found for all cultivars on the muck soils in South Florida compared to the other two sites, and for M‐81E compared to Dale and Topper 76‐6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1264 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M‐81E had lower brix than Dale and Topper 76‐6.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Material
M‐81Ee0
Outcome
primary crop brix valuese0
Direction
Lowe0
Comparator
Dale and Topper 76‐6e0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low primary crop brix values were found for all cultivars on the muck soils in South Florida compared to the other two sites, and for M‐81E compared to Dale and Topper 76‐6.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1264 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower brix correlated with greater fresh biomass production.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
fresh biomass productione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
low brix valuese0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“These low brix values were correlated with greater fresh biomass production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1341 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for more planting-date research and development of cultivars with better ratoon yield.

Taxon
Sweet Sorghumt0
Outcome
Further research is needed on planting dates for optimizing primary and ratoon crop yields along with varietal development with improved ratoon crop yieldse0

Verbatim

t0

“Sweet Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further research is needed on planting dates for optimizing primary and ratoon crop yields along with varietal development with improved ratoon crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1498 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

71 papers: 50 positive, 21 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.