Paper · 1995 · Ecology

Damage and Responsiveness of Jamaican Montane Tree Species after Disturbance by a Hurricane

P. J. Bellingham; E. V. J. Tanner; J. R. Healey

18
claims
31
verbatim quotes
230
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A severe hurricane affected Jamaican montane rain forests in 1988. We made local and widespread measurements of tree condition in three periods: prehurricane 1974–1984 (preh.); hurricane 1984—1989 (h.); and post—hurricane 1989—1992 (post—h.). In the h. period, 7.22% of stems and 4.72% of the total basal area died; crown loss was the most frequent cause of mortality. Among individual tree species, the hurricane caused a large range in mortality (0—26%) and non—fatal damage. Post—h. mortality was greater than mortality in the h. period, and varied among species. Post—h. stem growth rates (all species combined) were more than double the prehurricane rates, but species showed a considerable range from no significant increase to eight times greater. We classified 20 common tree species using damage scores (normalized h. mortality, plus normalized change in mortality from preh. to post—h., plus normalized complete crown loss in h.) and response scores (normalized change, preh. to post—h., in recruitment to the ≥ 3 cm dbh size class, plus normalized change in growth rate from preh. to post—h., plus normalized frequency of sprouts). Species were assigned to one of four groups: resistant (11 species), with low damage and low response; susceptible (5 species), with high damage and low response; resilient (1 species), with high damage and high response; and usurpers (3 species), with low damage and high responsiveness. The grouping of species was broadly related to their regeneration requirements. Most species with seedlings usually found under closed canopy were resistant; three of the four species with seedlings usually found on landslides were also resistant. Species with seedlings most frequently found in gaps included resilient, susceptible, and usurper species, but were not usually resistant. It is likely that the three species classified as usurpers will increase their relative abundance in the forest in the next decades and that Cyathea pubescens, which was very susceptible, will decrease in relative abundance of adults. Most of the other species are likely to have small changes in their relative abundances. Thus, at present, hurricanes have few long—term effects on the forests, although a change in the disturbance regime may alter this.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the hurricane period, 7.22% of stems and 4.72% of basal area died.

Taxon
Jamaican montane rain forestse1
Outcome
stemse0
Value
7.22%e0

Verbatim

e0

“In the h. period, 7.22% of stems and 4.72% of the total basal area died”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jamaican montane rain forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the hurricane period, 4.72% of total basal area died.

Taxon
Jamaican montane rain forestse1
Outcome
total basal areae0
Value
4.72%e0

Verbatim

e0

“In the h. period, 7.22% of stems and 4.72% of the total basal area died”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–314 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jamaican montane rain forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown loss was the most frequent cause of mortality.

Taxon
Jamaican montane rain forestse1
Outcome
crown losse0
Direction
most frequente0

Verbatim

e0

“crown loss was the most frequent cause of mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jamaican montane rain forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hurricane mortality across tree species ranged from 0 to 26%.

Taxon
tree speciese0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Value
0—26%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Among individual tree species, the hurricane caused a large range in mortality (0—26%) and non—fatal damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Posthurricane mortality exceeded hurricane-period mortality and varied among species.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
Post—h. mortalitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
mortality in the h. periode0

Verbatim

e0

“Post—h. mortality was greater than mortality in the h. period, and varied among species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–565 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Posthurricane stem growth rates more than doubled overall, with species ranging from no significant increase to eightfold.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
stem growth ratese0
Direction
more than doublee0
Comparator
prehurricane ratese0

Verbatim

e0

“Post—h. stem growth rates (all species combined) were more than double the prehurricane rates, but species showed a considerable range from no significant increase to eight times greater”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven species were classified resistant, with low damage and response.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
resistante0
Value
11 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“resistant (11 species), with low damage and low response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1244 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five species were susceptible, with high damage and low response.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Value
5 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“susceptible (5 species), with high damage and low response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1304 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One species was resilient, with high damage and response.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
resiliente0
Value
1 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“resilient (1 species), with high damage and high response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1363 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three species were usurpers, with low damage and high response.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
usurperse0
Value
3 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“usurpers (3 species), with low damage and high responsiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1430 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damage-response groups were broadly related to species regeneration requirements.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
grouping of speciese0
Comparator
regeneration requirementse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The grouping of species was broadly related to their regeneration requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1510 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most species with seedlings beneath closed canopy were resistant.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
resistante0
Setting
under closed canopye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Most species with seedlings usually found under closed canopy were resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three of four species with seedlings on landslides were resistant.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
resistante0
Value
three of the four speciese0
Setting
on landslidese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“three of the four species with seedlings usually found on landslides were also resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1678 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gap-seedling species included resilient, susceptible and usurper groups, but were usually not resistant.

Taxon
Speciese0
Outcome
resilient, susceptible, and usurper speciese0
Setting
in gapse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Species with seedlings most frequently found in gaps included resilient, susceptible, and usurper species, but were not usually resistant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1817 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Authors project increased relative abundance of three usurper species.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
relative abundancee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
three speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“the three species classified as usurpers will increase their relative abundance in the forest in the next decades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1837–1950 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Authors project decreased adult relative abundance of Cyathea pubescens.

Taxon
Cyathea pubescense0
Outcome
relative abundance of adultse0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“Cyathea pubescens, which was very susceptible, will decrease in relative abundance of adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2052 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Most other species are projected to have small abundance changes.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
relative abundancese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the other species are likely to have small changes in their relative abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2141 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–398 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Hurricanes currently appear to have few long-term forest effects, though a changed disturbance regime may alter this.

Taxon
Jamaican montane rain forestse1
Outcome
few long—term effects on the forestse0

Verbatim

e0

“at present, hurricanes have few long—term effects on the forests, although a change in the disturbance regime may alter this”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2149–2273 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jamaican montane rain forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑