Paper · 2008 · Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research

The Effect of Selected Plant Materials and Extracts on the Development of Bacterial Diseases on Onion

Beata Kowalska; Urszula Smolińska

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The Effect of Selected Plant Materials and Extracts on the Development of Bacterial Diseases on Onion The effects of Brassicaceae and Solanaceae plant residues and water extracts from these residues on the growth of onion ( Allium cepa L.) pathogenic bacteria Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum, Burkholderia cepacia and Burkholderia gladioli pv. alliicola were examined. The influence of these materials on the development of bacterial diseases on onion bulbs was also investigated. The toxic effect depended on the kind and amount of the agent used and also on the species of examined bacteria. The water extract from Brassica napus cv. Kana and water extract from Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Remiz decreased a density of three examined bacteria in nutrient broth medium. Also milled seeds of Brassica juncea cv. Małopolska expressed an inhibitory effect towards B. cepacia and B. gladioli pv. alliicola. However, milled seeds of B. napus cv. Kana used as an addition to liquid medium did not decrease the density of these bacteria. In the experiment on onion bulbs the most promising results were obtained for milled seeds of B. juncea cv. Małopolska. This material used both as a source of volatile compounds and also in direct contact with the inoculated place on the onion bulb, inhibited diseases development caused by all three examined bacteria. B. juncea contains very high concentration of 2-propenyl ITC and probably this compound caused decrease in density of bacteria and the reduction of disease development. Purified, commercially obtained 2-propenyl ITC proved a very strong antibacterial activity and also inhibited disease development on onion. The commercial products Funguran Easy 50 WP and Biosept 33SL were also used but they showed very weak activity in protection of onion against the tested bacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extract of Brassica napus Kana reduced three bacterial densities in broth.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
water extract from Brassica napus cv. Kanae0
Outcome
density of three examined bacteriae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water extract from Brassica napus cv. Kana and water extract from Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Remiz decreased a density of three examined bacteria in nutrient broth medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extract of Lycopersicon esculentum Remiz reduced three bacterial densities in broth.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
water extract from Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Remize0
Outcome
density of three examined bacteriae0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water extract from Brassica napus cv. Kana and water extract from Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Remiz decreased a density of three examined bacteria in nutrient broth medium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled Brassica juncea seeds inhibited B. cepacia in broth.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
milled seeds of Brassica juncea cv. Małopolskae0
Interactor
B. cepaciaBurkholderia cepaciae0pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effect towards B. cepaciae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia cepacia
Burkholderia cepacia · InteractorPhoto Credit: CDC/Janice Carr Content Providers: CDC/Janice Carr · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“milled seeds of Brassica juncea cv. Małopolska expressed an inhibitory effect towards B. cepacia and B. gladioli pv. alliicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled Brassica juncea seeds inhibited B. gladioli in broth.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
milled seeds of Brassica juncea cv. Małopolskae0
Interactor
B. gladioli pv. alliicolaBurkholderia gladioli pv. alliicolae0pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“milled seeds of Brassica juncea cv. Małopolska expressed an inhibitory effect towards B. cepacia and B. gladioli pv. alliicola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–916 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled Brassica napus seeds did not decrease densities of these bacteria in broth.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
milled seeds of B. napus cv. Kanae0
Outcome
density of these bacteriae0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“milled seeds of B. napus cv. Kana used as an addition to liquid medium did not decrease the density of these bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled Brassica juncea seeds applied as volatiles inhibited disease caused by all three bacteria on onion bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
source of volatile compoundse0
Outcome
diseases development caused by all three examined bacteriae0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This material used both as a source of volatile compounds and also in direct contact with the inoculated place on the onion bulb, inhibited diseases development caused by all three examined bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“milled seeds of B. juncea cv. Małopolska”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled Brassica juncea seeds in direct contact inhibited disease caused by all three bacteria on onion bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
direct contact with the inoculated place on the onion bulbe0
Outcome
diseases development caused by all three examined bacteriae0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This material used both as a source of volatile compounds and also in direct contact with the inoculated place on the onion bulb, inhibited diseases development caused by all three examined bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1365 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute bacterial density and disease reduction to 2-propenyl ITC in B. juncea.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Compound
2-propenyl ITCe0
Outcome
decrease in density of bacteria and the reduction of disease developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. juncea contains very high concentration of 2-propenyl ITC and probably this compound caused decrease in density of bacteria and the reduction of disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1533 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Purified 2-propenyl ITC showed strong antibacterial activity and inhibited onion disease.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
2-propenyl ITCe0
Outcome
antibacterial activity and also inhibited disease developmente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Purified, commercially obtained 2-propenyl ITC proved a very strong antibacterial activity and also inhibited disease development on onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1674 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Funguran Easy 50 WP showed weak protection of onion against tested bacteria.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Funguran Easy 50 WPe0
Outcome
activity in protection of onion against the tested bacteriae0
Direction
very weake0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The commercial products Funguran Easy 50 WP and Biosept 33SL were also used but they showed very weak activity in protection of onion against the tested bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biosept 33SL showed weak protection of onion against tested bacteria.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Biosept 33SLe0
Outcome
activity in protection of onion against the tested bacteriae0
Direction
very weake0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The commercial products Funguran Easy 50 WP and Biosept 33SL were also used but they showed very weak activity in protection of onion against the tested bacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1837 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

99 papers: 89 positive, 10 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.