Paper · 1990 · Crop Science

Allelopathy and Autotoxicity in Alfalfa: Characterization and Effects of Preceding Crops and Residue Incorporation

Ramesh S. Hedge; D. A. Miller

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
115
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) is known to be both autotoxic and allelopathic. Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to determine if ‘WL‐316’ alfalfa exhibits short‐term autotoxicity and long‐term autotoxicity and allelopathy. Long‐term autotoxicity and allelopathy of alfalfa were verified at Urbana, IL, by comparing the germination and growth of alfalfa and sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] on Flanagan silt loam (fine, montmorillonitic, mesic Aquic Argiudoll) previously cropped to alfalfa (alfalfa‐soil) and sorghum (sorghum‐soil). Short‐term autotoxicity of alfalfa was investigated by studying the effect of incorporating its roots only and both roots and shoots on the germination and growth of alfalfa in alfalfasoil and sorghum‐soil. The data were further supported by a laboratory bioassay of seedling exudate and shoot leachate of alfalfa and sorghum. Plant height and fresh weight per plant of alfalfa and fresh weight per plant of sorghum were lower on alfalfa‐soil than on sorghum‐soil. Germination percentages of both alfalfa and sorghum and plant height of sorghum were unaffected by the preceding crop. The two soils differed in nutrient content, but fertility was high and should not have been limiting to the growth of either crop. As a result, allelopathic/autotoxic compounds in alfalfa‐soil were implicated in the growth inhibition of the two crops. Soil incorporation of fresh alfalfa roots only or both roots and shoots reduced alfalfa emergence, plant height, and dry weight per plant. Primary effects of water‐soluble inhibitory compounds from alfalfa shoot appeared to be on germination and radicle elongation, the latter being apparently more sensitive than the former. Alfalfa allelopathy seems to be more severe than autotoxicity. A flow diagram describes different kinds of allelopathy and autotoxicity and various situations that verify the existence of a particular kind of allelopathy or autotoxicity

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa plant height and fresh weight per plant were lower on alfalfa-soil than on sorghum-soil.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
alfalfa‐soile0
Outcome
Plant height and fresh weight per plant of alfalfae0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sorghum‐soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and fresh weight per plant of alfalfa and fresh weight per plant of sorghum were lower on alfalfa‐soil than on sorghum‐soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum fresh weight per plant was lower on alfalfa-soil than on sorghum-soil.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
alfalfa‐soile0
Outcome
fresh weight per plant of sorghume0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
sorghum‐soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and fresh weight per plant of alfalfa and fresh weight per plant of sorghum were lower on alfalfa‐soil than on sorghum‐soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa germination percentage was unaffected by the preceding crop.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
preceding crope0
Outcome
Germination percentagese0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentages of both alfalfa and sorghum and plant height of sorghum were unaffected by the preceding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum germination percentage was unaffected by the preceding crop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
preceding crope0
Outcome
Germination percentagese0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentages of both alfalfa and sorghum and plant height of sorghum were unaffected by the preceding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum plant height was unaffected by the preceding crop.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
preceding crope0
Outcome
plant height of sorghume0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination percentages of both alfalfa and sorghum and plant height of sorghum were unaffected by the preceding crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The alfalfa-soil and sorghum-soil differed in nutrient content.

Outcome
nutrient contente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The two soils differed in nutrient content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1183 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allelopathic/autotoxic compounds in alfalfa-soil were implicated in growth inhibition of the two crops.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Compound
allelopathic/autotoxic compoundse0
Outcome
growth inhibition of the two cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allelopathic/autotoxic compounds in alfalfa‐soil were implicated in the growth inhibition of the two crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil incorporation of fresh alfalfa roots only, or roots and shoots, reduced alfalfa emergence, plant height and dry weight per plant.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Soil incorporation of fresh alfalfa roots only or both roots and shootse0
Outcome
alfalfa emergence, plant height, and dry weight per plante0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil incorporation of fresh alfalfa roots only or both roots and shoots reduced alfalfa emergence, plant height, and dry weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1530 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble inhibitory compounds from alfalfa shoot appeared to act primarily on germination and radicle elongation, radicle elongation being more sensitive.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Compound
water‐soluble inhibitory compoundse0
Outcome
germination and radicle elongatione0
Qualifier
the latter being apparently more sensitive than the formere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primary effects of water‐soluble inhibitory compounds from alfalfa shoot appeared to be on germination and radicle elongation, the latter being apparently more sensitive than the former”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1717 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa allelopathy seems to be more severe than autotoxicity.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
allelopathy seems to be more severe than autotoxicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alfalfa allelopathy seems to be more severe than autotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1780 · show in text ↑

rotation · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

rotation · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.