Paper · 2014 · PLoS ONE

Responses of Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.) to Different Planting Methods for Grain Yield and Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in the Single Cropping Season

Song Chen; Danying Wang; Chunmei Xu; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To break the yield ceiling of rice production, a super rice project was developed in 1996 to breed rice varieties with super high yield. A two-year experiment was conducted to evaluate yield and nitrogen (N)-use response of super rice to different planting methods in the single cropping season. A total of 17 rice varieties, including 13 super rice and four non-super checks (CK), were grown under three N levels [0 (N0), 150 (N150), and 225 (N225) kg ha-1] and two planting methods [transplanting (TP) and direct-seeding in wet conditions (WDS)]. Grain yield under WDS (7.69 t ha-1) was generally lower than TP (8.58 t ha-1). However, grain yield under different planting methods was affected by N rates as well as variety groups. In both years, there was no difference in grain yield between super and CK varieties at N150, irrespective of planting methods. However, grain yield difference was dramatic in japonica groups at N225, that is, there was an 11.3% and 14.1% average increase in super rice than in CK varieties in WDS and TP, respectively. This suggests that high N input contributes to narrowing the yield gap in super rice varieties, which also indicates that super rice was bred for high fertility conditions. In the japonica group, more N was accumulated in super rice than in CK at N225, but no difference was found between super and CK varieties at N0 and N150. Similar results were also found for N agronomic efficiency. The results suggest that super rice varieties have an advantage for N-use efficiency when high N is applied. The response of super rice was greater under TP than under WDS. The results suggest that the need to further improve agronomic and other management practices to achieve high yield and N-use efficiency for super rice varieties in WDS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under direct-seeding in wet conditions (WDS, 7.69 t ha-1) was generally lower than under transplanting (TP, 8.58 t ha-1).

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Treatment
WDSe2
Outcome
Grain yielde2
Direction
lowere2
Value
7.69 t ha-1e2
Qualifier
8.58 t ha-1e2
Comparator
TPe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e2

“Grain yield under WDS (7.69 t ha-1) was generally lower than TP (8.58 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N150, grain yield did not differ between super and CK varieties, irrespective of planting method.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Treatment
N150e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
irrespective of planting methodse3
Comparator
CK varietiese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e3

“In both years, there was no difference in grain yield between super and CK varieties at N150, irrespective of planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In japonica groups at N225 under WDS, super rice gave an 11.3% average grain yield increase over CK varieties.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
japonica groupse4
Treatment
N225e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
11.3%e4
Qualifier
in WDSe4
Comparator
CK varietiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain yield difference was dramatic in japonica groups at N225, that is, there was an 11.3% and 14.1% average increase in super rice than in CK varieties in WDS and TP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In japonica groups at N225 under TP, super rice gave a 14.1% average grain yield increase over CK varieties.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
japonica groupse4
Treatment
N225e4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasee4
Value
14.1%e4
Qualifier
TPe4
Comparator
CK varietiese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain yield difference was dramatic in japonica groups at N225, that is, there was an 11.3% and 14.1% average increase in super rice than in CK varieties in WDS and TP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the japonica group at N225, super rice accumulated more N than CK.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
japonica groupe5
Treatment
N225e5
Outcome
more N was accumulatede5
Direction
moree5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the japonica group, more N was accumulated in super rice than in CK at N225, but no difference was found between super and CK varieties at N0 and N150”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At N0 and N150, no difference in N accumulation was found between super rice and CK varieties.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
japonica groupe5
Treatment
N0 and N150e5
Outcome
more N was accumulatede5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
CK varietiese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the japonica group, more N was accumulated in super rice than in CK at N225, but no difference was found between super and CK varieties at N0 and N150”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar to N accumulation, N agronomic efficiency was higher in super rice than in CK at N225.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
japonica groupe5
Treatment
N225e5
Outcome
N agronomic efficiencye6
Direction
higherinferrede6
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“In the japonica group, more N was accumulated in super rice than in CK at N225”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1304 · show in text ↑
e6

“Similar results were also found for N agronomic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1439 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super rice varieties had an advantage for N-use efficiency when high N was applied.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Treatment
high Ne7
Outcome
N-use efficiencye7
Direction
higherinferrede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results suggest that super rice varieties have an advantage for N-use efficiency when high N is applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The response of super rice was greater under TP than under WDS.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Treatment
TPe1
Outcome
response of super ricee1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
WDSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“The response of super rice was greater under TP than under WDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1612 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under different planting methods was affected by N rates and variety groups.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativat0
Material
variety groupse1
Treatment
N ratese1
Outcome
grain yield under different planting methodse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Super Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield under different planting methods was affected by N rates as well as variety groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–731 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic and other management practices should be further improved to achieve high yield and N-use efficiency for super rice varieties in WDS.

Taxon
super rice varietiese1
Outcome
improve agronomic and other management practicese1

Verbatim

e1

“The results suggest that the need to further improve agronomic and other management practices to achieve high yield and N-use efficiency for super rice varieties in WDS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1782 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High N input narrows the yield gap in super rice varieties.

Taxon
super rice varietiese1
Treatment
high N inpute1
Outcome
yield gape1
Direction
narrowinge1

Verbatim

e1

“This suggests that high N input contributes to narrowing the yield gap in super rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1147 · show in text ↑

transplanting · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.