Paper · 1990 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Variation in oil concentration and economic return from tea-tree ( Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) oil

GJ Murtagh; RJ Etherington

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The oil concentration in tea-tree (Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) twigs was measured over 8 consecutive days during November 1987, and over 10 out of 12 consecutive days in January 1989. The oil concentration, measured in units of volume of oil per unit dry weight of twigs (v/DW), varied markedly between successive days, from 2.9-1.8% v/DW (a 38% decrease) to 1.8-3.4% v/DW (a 89% increase). The reason for such variation is unknown but it had a pronounced effect on the profitability of growing the crop. The profit, which was expressed as a return on the total set-up cost of $A17 2591ha, was estimated for each of the measured oil concentrations and fixed values of biomass yield, the price of oil and average production costs. The extreme daily variations in oil concentration mentioned above caused the return on investment to decline by 11 percentage points and increase by 16 points, respectively. When measured at the same site, the mean oil concentration increased from 3.1% vPW in November 1987 to 5.8% v/DW in January 1989. As a consequence, the respective mean returns on investment increased from 0 to 26%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twig oil concentration fell from 2.9 to 1.8% v/DW across successive days.

Taxon
tea-treeCamellia sinensise0
Organ / stage
twigse0
Outcome
oil concentratione2
Direction
decreasee1
Value
38%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tea-tree (Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“from 2.9-1.8% v/DW (a 38% decrease)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–357 · show in text ↑
e2

“The oil concentration, measured in units of volume of oil per unit dry weight of twigs (v/DW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–279 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twig oil concentration rose from 1.8 to 3.4% v/DW across successive days.

Taxon
tea-treeCamellia sinensise0
Organ / stage
twigse0
Outcome
oil concentratione2
Direction
increasee1
Value
89%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tea-tree (Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) twigs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“to 1.8-3.4% v/DW (a 89% increase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–391 · show in text ↑
e2

“The oil concentration, measured in units of volume of oil per unit dry weight of twigs (v/DW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–279 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The oil concentration decline caused return on investment to decline by 11 percentage points.

Taxon
tea-treeCamellia sinensise0
Compound
oil concentratione1
Outcome
return on investmente1
Direction
declinee1
Value
11 percentage pointse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tea-tree ( Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“daily variations in oil concentration mentioned above caused the return on investment to decline by 11 percentage points”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–864 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The oil concentration rise caused return on investment to increase by 16 points.

Taxon
tea-treeCamellia sinensise0
Compound
oil concentratione1
Outcome
return on investmente1
Direction
increasee1
Value
16 pointse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tea-tree ( Melaleuca alternifolia Cheel) oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“daily variations in oil concentration mentioned above caused the return on investment to decline by 11 percentage points and increase by 16 points, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–904 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean oil concentration increased from 3.1% vPW to 5.8% v/DW between November 1987 and January 1989.

Taxon
tea-treeCamellia sinensist0
Outcome
mean oil concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.1% vPW in November 1987 to 5.8% v/DWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean oil concentration increased from 3.1% vPW in November 1987 to 5.8% v/DW in January 1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1034 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea-tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Mean return on investment increased from 0 to 26%.

Taxon
tea-treeCamellia sinensist0
Outcome
mean returns on investmente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0 to 26%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“respective mean returns on investment increased from 0 to 26%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea-tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑