Paper · 2013 · Agronomy Journal

Agronomic Responses of Continuous Corn to Stover, Tillage, and Nitrogen Management

A. J. Sindelar; J. A. Coulter; J. A. Lamb; et al.

11
claims
26
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Corn ( Zea mays L.) stover removal for biofuel production is expected to increase in the near future. Previous research suggests stover removal is best suited to continuous corn (CC) cropping systems with reduced tillage. However, grain yields in reduced tillage CC systems in the Upper Midwest can be reduced because of cool soil temperatures restricting early‐season growth. Field experiments were conducted over 3 yr at two locations in southern Minnesota with medium‐ and fine‐textured soils to assess the agronomic responses of CC to stover removal, tillage system, and fertilizer N rate. Stover removal and/or tillage increased soil temperature by as much as 4°C, and differences among treatments generally existed until canopy closure. Corn emergence was 6% greater with stover removal in no‐tillage (NT), but was not affected by stover removal in chisel‐tillage (CT) and strip‐tillage (ST). Stover removal increased normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) at the eight leaf collar stage (V8) by 20 and 13% in NT and ST, respectively, but had no effect on NDVI in CT. Stover removal decreased the economically optimum N rate (EONR) by >12 and >19 kg N ha –1 in NT and ST, respectively, and increased grain yield at the EONR by 7, 9, and 6% in CT, NT, and ST, respectively. These results indicate stover removal can improve short‐term agronomic productivity of moderate‐ to high‐yielding CC on productive soils in the Upper Midwest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal and/or tillage raised soil temperature by up to 4°C.

Treatment
Stover removal and/or tillagee0
Outcome
soil temperaturee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stover removal and/or tillage increased soil temperature by as much as 4°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal increased corn emergence by 6% under no-tillage.

Treatment
stover removale0
Outcome
Corn emergencee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
6%e0
Qualifier
no‐tillage (NT)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn emergence was 6% greater with stover removal in no‐tillage (NT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal did not affect emergence under chisel or strip tillage.

Treatment
stover removale0
Outcome
emergencee1
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
chisel‐tillage (CT) and strip‐tillage (ST)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was not affected by stover removal in chisel‐tillage (CT) and strip‐tillage (ST)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn emergence was 6% greater with stover removal in no‐tillage (NT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal increased NDVI at V8 by 20% under no-tillage.

Organ / stage
eight leaf collar stage (V8)e0
Treatment
Stover removale0
Outcome
normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20e0
Qualifier
NTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stover removal increased normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) at the eight leaf collar stage (V8) by 20 and 13% in NT and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal increased NDVI at V8 by 13% under strip tillage.

Organ / stage
eight leaf collar stage (V8)e0
Treatment
Stover removale0
Outcome
normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
STe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stover removal increased normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) at the eight leaf collar stage (V8) by 20 and 13% in NT and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal had no effect on NDVI under chisel tillage.

Treatment
Stover removale1
Outcome
NDVIe0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
CTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had no effect on NDVI in CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stover removal increased normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal lowered EONR by more than 12 kg N ha –1 under no-tillage.

Treatment
Stover removale0
Outcome
economically optimum N rate (EONR)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
>12e0
Qualifier
NTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stover removal decreased the economically optimum N rate (EONR) by >12 and >19 kg N ha –1 in NT and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal lowered EONR by more than 19 kg N ha –1 under strip tillage.

Treatment
Stover removale0
Outcome
economically optimum N rate (EONR)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
>19 kg N ha –1e0
Qualifier
STe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stover removal decreased the economically optimum N rate (EONR) by >12 and >19 kg N ha –1 in NT and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal increased grain yield at EONR by 7% in chisel tillage.

Treatment
Stover removale1
Outcome
grain yield at the EONRe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7e0
Qualifier
CTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield at the EONR by 7, 9, and 6% in CT, NT, and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stover removal decreased the economically optimum N rate (EONR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal increased grain yield at EONR by 9% in no-tillage.

Treatment
Stover removale1
Outcome
grain yield at the EONRe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9e0
Qualifier
NTe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield at the EONR by 7, 9, and 6% in CT, NT, and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stover removal decreased the economically optimum N rate (EONR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover removal increased grain yield at EONR by 6% in strip tillage.

Treatment
Stover removale1
Outcome
grain yield at the EONRe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Qualifier
STe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield at the EONR by 7, 9, and 6% in CT, NT, and ST, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“Stover removal decreased the economically optimum N rate (EONR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.