Paper · 2003 · Scientia Agricola

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Citrus sinensis and Citrus limonia epicotyl segments

Weliton Antonio Bastos de Almeida; Francisco de Assis Alves Mourão Filho; Beatriz Madalena Januzzi Mendes; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Genetic transformation allows the release of improved cultivars with desirable characteristics in a shorter period of time and therefore may be useful in citrus breeding programs. The objective of this research was to establish a protocol for genetic transformation of Valencia and Natal sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) and Rangpur lime (Citrus limonia L. Osbeck). Epicotyl segments of germinated in vitro plantlets (three weeks in darkness and two weeks in a 16-h photoperiod) were used as explants. These were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA-105 and different experiments were done to evaluate the transformation efficiency: explants were co-cultivated with Agrobacterium for one, three or five days; explants were incubated with Agrobacterium suspension for 5, 10, 20 or 40 minutes; co-cultivation medium was supplemented with acetosyringone at 0, 100 or 200 µmol L-1; Explants ends had a longitudinal terminal incision (2-3 mm); co-cultivation temperatures of 19, 23 or 27°C were imposed. The experimental design was completely randomized in all experiments with five replications, each consisted of a Petri dish (100 x 15 mm) with 30 explants and resulted in a total of 150 explants per treatment. Longitudinal terminal incision in the explant ends did not improve shoot regeneration. However, transgenic plants of all three cultivars were confirmed from explants that had been subjected to inoculation time of 20 minutes, co-culture of three days at 23-27°C, in the absence of acetosyringone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longitudinal terminal incision of explant ends did not improve shoot regeneration in citrus.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
Longitudinal terminal incision in the explant endse1
Outcome
shoot regeneratione1
Direction
did not improvee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Longitudinal terminal incision in the explant ends did not improve shoot regeneration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus sinensis and Citrus limonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenic plants of all three cultivars were confirmed from explants inoculated for 20 minutes, co-cultured for three days at 23-27°C, without acetosyringone.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Material
Valencia and Natal sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) and Rangpur lime (Citrus limonia L. Osbeck)e3
Treatment
inoculation time of 20 minutes, co-culture of three days at 23-27°C, in the absence of acetosyringonee2
Outcome
transgenic plantse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“transgenic plants of all three cultivars were confirmed from explants that had been subjected to inoculation time of 20 minutes, co-culture of three days at 23-27°C, in the absence of acetosyringone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1531 · show in text ↑
e3

“Valencia and Natal sweet oranges (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) and Rangpur lime (Citrus limonia L. Osbeck)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–373 · show in text ↑
t0

“Citrus sinensis and Citrus limonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–75 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · CitrusPositive and negative results

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.