Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Spraying Alfalfa Hay with Water Before Baling to Minimize Harvesting Losses1

M. J. Anderson; C. H. Mickelsen

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling to determine if harvest losses could be reduced to the same level as dew‐moistened hay. Three studies were conducted. Study I compared hay that was dry, dew‐moistened, and sprayed with 1 liter of water per 4 m (1–4) of windrow. Study II compared the 1–4 rate to 1 liter of water per 2 m (1–2) of windrow. Spraying preceded baling by 5 to 10 minutes in studies I and II. Study III compared dry, dew‐moistened, and sprayed at the 1–4 rate 0, 5 and 10 minutes before baling. Strips over 150 m long were harvested with a 3.65‐m swather‐conditioner. Each swath was a replicate. There were 10, 6, and 11 replicates per study, respectively. Yields, chemical composition, and digestibility were determined. Digestibility and yields of dry matter (DM) and digestible DM were approximately 4, 1, and 6% higher for the sprayed hay than for the dry hay in study I. Yield of sprayed hay and dew‐moistened hay were comparable. Yields were slightly higher for the 1–2 spraying rate than for the 1‐4 rate but the differences were not significant. In study III yields were not as high for sprayed hay as for dew‐moistened hay. The 0 and 5 minute spray treatments had higher yields than the dry hay. We believe a higher spraying level should have been applied in study III. Spraying hay with water will reduce DM losses and increase nutritive value when dry, brittle hay is harvested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed alfalfa hay had approximately 4 % higher digestibility than dry hay in study I.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sprayed haye1
Outcome
Digestibilitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
approximately 4e1
Comparator
dry haye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Digestibility and yields of dry matter (DM) and digestible DM were approximately 4, 1, and 6% higher for the sprayed hay than for the dry hay in study I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed alfalfa hay had approximately 1 % higher dry matter yield than dry hay in study I.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sprayed haye1
Outcome
yields of dry matter (DM)e1
Direction
highere1
Value
1e1
Qualifier
approximatelye1
Comparator
dry haye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Digestibility and yields of dry matter (DM) and digestible DM were approximately 4, 1, and 6% higher for the sprayed hay than for the dry hay in study I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed alfalfa hay had 6 % higher digestible dry matter yield than dry hay in study I.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sprayed haye1
Outcome
digestible DMe1
Direction
highere1
Value
6%e1
Comparator
dry haye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Digestibility and yields of dry matter (DM) and digestible DM were approximately 4, 1, and 6% higher for the sprayed hay than for the dry hay in study I”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of sprayed alfalfa hay was comparable to dew-moistened hay.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sprayed haye2
Outcome
Yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
dew‐moistened haye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield of sprayed hay and dew‐moistened hay were comparable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was slightly higher with the 1–2 spraying rate than with the 1‐4 rate in alfalfa hay, but not significantly.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
1–2 spraying ratee3
Outcome
Yieldse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
1‐4 ratee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yields were slightly higher for the 1–2 spraying rate than for the 1‐4 rate but the differences were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In study III, sprayed alfalfa hay yields were not as high as dew-moistened hay yields.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
sprayed haye4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
not as highe4
Comparator
dew‐moistened haye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“In study III yields were not as high for sprayed hay as for dew‐moistened hay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0 and 5 minute spray treatments gave higher alfalfa hay yields than dry hay.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
0 and 5 minute spray treatmentse5
Outcome
yieldse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
dry haye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“The 0 and 5 minute spray treatments had higher yields than the dry hay”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1279 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A higher spraying level should have been applied in study III for alfalfa hay.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
spraying levele6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spraying Alfalfa Hay with Water Before Baling to Minimize Harvesting Losses1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e6

“We believe a higher spraying level should have been applied in study III”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1353 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying alfalfa hay with water reduces dry matter losses and increases nutritive value when dry, brittle hay is harvested.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
reduce DM losses and increase nutritive valuee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) hay was sprayed with a fine mist of water before baling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“Spraying hay with water will reduce DM losses and increase nutritive value when dry, brittle hay is harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1464 · show in text ↑

application · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 27 positive, 6 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 31 positive, 7 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

application · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.