Paper · 1999 · Plant Disease

Triazole Seed Treatments Suppress Spore Production by Puccinia recondita, Septoria tritici, and Stagonospora nodorum from Wheat Leaves

D. R. Sundin; W. W. Bockus; M. G. Eversmeyer

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Treatments of winter wheat seed with the systemic triazole fungicides triadimenol (31 g a.i./100 kg = Baytan 30F at 1.5 fl oz/cwt) and difenoconazole (24 g a.i./100 kg = Dividend 3FS at 1.0 fl. oz/cwt) were tested for effect on asexual sporulation by Puccinia recondita, Septoria tritici, and Stagonospora nodorum. Spore production was measured on seedlings grown in a growth chamber (24°C day/15°C night, 12-h photoperiod) and inoculated with the pathogens 3, 5, or 7 weeks after sowing. Spore production was converted to a percentage of the non-treated control and regressed against weeks after planting when plants were inoculated. Linear models fit data for both fungicides against all three pathogens. According to the models, difenoconazole suppressed sporulation levels of P. recondita and Septoria tritici to 10% of the levels on plants from non-treated seed for about 3 weeks after sowing. Spore production for all three fungi was suppressed to 25% of the non-treated level for at least 4.2 weeks and to 50% for at least 6.5 weeks. Similarly, triadimenol suppressed all three pathogens to 50% of the non-treated level for at least 3.2 weeks. The two fungicides showed similar effects against S. tritici; however, difenoconazole showed significantly greater suppression of sporulation by P. recondita and Stagonospora nodorum compared with triadimenol. Responses occurred even though large concentrations of spores were used to inoculate plants and environmental conditions were optimized for spore production. Reduced sporulation should help protect fall-planted wheat seedlings and may significantly delay epidemics in the following spring.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linear models fit the fungicide sporulation data for all three pathogens.

Outcome
fit datae0
Comparator
both fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Linear models fit data for both fungicides against all three pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole suppressed P. recondita sporulation to 10% for about three weeks.

Treatment
difenoconazolee0
Interactor
P. reconditaPuccinia reconditae0pathogen
Outcome
sporulation levels of P. reconditae0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
about 3 weeks after sowinge0
Comparator
non-treated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia recondita
Puccinia recondita · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorybjoerns · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difenoconazole suppressed sporulation levels of P. recondita and Septoria tritici to 10% of the levels on plants from non-treated seed for about 3 weeks after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole suppressed Septoria tritici sporulation to 10% for about three weeks.

Treatment
difenoconazolee0
Interactor
Septoria triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
sporulation levels of P. recondita and Septoria triticie0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
about 3 weeks after sowinge0
Comparator
non-treated seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difenoconazole suppressed sporulation levels of P. recondita and Septoria tritici to 10% of the levels on plants from non-treated seed for about 3 weeks after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole suppressed all three fungi to 25% for at least 4.2 weeks.

Treatment
difenoconazolee1
Outcome
Spore production for all three fungie0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
25%e0
Qualifier
at least 4.2 weekse0
Comparator
non-treated levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spore production for all three fungi was suppressed to 25% of the non-treated level for at least 4.2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1005 · show in text ↑
e1

“difenoconazole suppressed sporulation levels of P. recondita and Septoria tritici to 10% of the levels on plants from non-treated seed for about 3 weeks after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole suppressed all three fungi to 50% for at least 6.5 weeks.

Treatment
difenoconazolee1
Outcome
Spore production for all three fungie0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
at least 6.5 weekse0
Comparator
non-treated levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spore production for all three fungi was suppressed to 25% of the non-treated level for at least 4.2 weeks and to 50% for at least 6.5 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“difenoconazole suppressed sporulation levels of P. recondita and Septoria tritici to 10% of the levels on plants from non-treated seed for about 3 weeks after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triadimenol suppressed all three pathogens to 50% for at least 3.2 weeks.

Treatment
triadimenole0
Outcome
all three pathogense0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
at least 3.2 weekse0
Comparator
non-treated levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“triadimenol suppressed all three pathogens to 50% of the non-treated level for at least 3.2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicides had similar effects against S. tritici.

Interactor
S. triticiZymoseptoria triticie0pathogen
Outcome
similar effects against S. triticie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two fungicides showed similar effects against S. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1211 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole suppressed P. recondita sporulation more than triadimenol.

Treatment
difenoconazolee0
Interactor
P. reconditaPuccinia reconditae0pathogen
Outcome
sporulation by P. reconditae0
Direction
greater suppressione0
Comparator
triadimenole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia recondita
Puccinia recondita · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorybjoerns · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difenoconazole showed significantly greater suppression of sporulation by P. recondita and Stagonospora nodorum compared with triadimenol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Difenoconazole suppressed Stagonospora nodorum sporulation more than triadimenol.

Treatment
difenoconazolee0
Interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume0pathogen
Outcome
sporulation by P. recondita and Stagonospora nodorume0
Direction
greater suppressione0
Comparator
triadimenole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · InteractorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difenoconazole showed significantly greater suppression of sporulation by P. recondita and Stagonospora nodorum compared with triadimenol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1359 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–127 · show in text ↑

difenoconazole · Parastagonospora nodorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

difenoconazole · Puccinia recondita · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

difenoconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.