Abstract
Abstract During a 3‐year period at three locations, the effects of populations and row spacings on 10 corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids (early, medium, and late maturing) were evaluated. Grain yields were increased as the width between rows decreased. Yields were usually higher with the late maturing variety planted at a medium or high population. Some exceptions to this generalization were observed. Percentage moisture in the grain at harvest was not affected by row spacings or plant populations but was affected by the hybrid used. Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity. The ear‐to‐stover ratio was greatly affected by hybrids but was little influenced by row spacings and plant populations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yields were increased as the width between rows decreased.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0 - Treatment
- width between rows decreasede0
- Outcome
- Grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields were increased as the width between rows decreased.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Yields were usually higher with the late maturing variety planted at a medium or high population.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Material
- late maturing varietye0
- Treatment
- medium or high populatione0
- Outcome
- Yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Yields were usually higher with the late maturing variety planted at a medium or high population.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Percentage moisture in the grain at harvest was not affected by row spacings or plant populations
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- row spacings or plant populationse0
- Outcome
- Percentage moisture in the grain at harveste0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Percentage moisture in the grain at harvest was not affected by row spacings or plant populations”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Percentage moisture in the grain at harvest was not affected by row spacings or plant populations but was affected by the hybrid used.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- hybrid usede0
- Outcome
- Percentage moisture in the grain at harveste0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Percentage moisture in the grain at harvest was not affected by row spacings or plant populations but was affected by the hybrid used.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- decrease in row spacinge0
- Outcome
- Ear weighte0
- Direction
- ‐increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- plant populatione0
- Outcome
- Ear weighte0
- Direction
- ‐increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- increased time required for maturitye0
- Outcome
- Ear weighte0
- Direction
- ‐increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ear weight ‐increased with a decrease in row spacing and plant population and with increased time required for maturity.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
The ear‐to‐stover ratio was greatly affected by hybrids but was little influenced by row spacings and plant populations.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- hybridse0
- Outcome
- ear‐to‐stover ratioe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The ear‐to‐stover ratio was greatly affected by hybrids but was little influenced by row spacings and plant populations.”
t0“Corn”
Claim · model-written summary
The ear‐to‐stover ratio was greatly affected by hybrids but was little influenced by row spacings and plant populations.
- Taxon
- CornZea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- row spacings and plant populationse0
- Outcome
- ear‐to‐stover ratioe0
- Direction
- little influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The ear‐to‐stover ratio was greatly affected by hybrids but was little influenced by row spacings and plant populations.”
t0“Corn”
The same questions in other papers
in vitro · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →stage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
654 papers more in this group
See all 658 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.