Paper · 2014 · Advanced materials research

Maize Growth and Development in Tillage Method, Planting Date and Density

Ji Lin Yu; Hua Qi; Zhi Qiang Lin

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to study the effect of tillage method, sowing date and plant density on population physiological index and morphological trait on maize, a split-plot experiment was carried out. Main plot was tillage method with two levels (conventional tillage vs. deep loosing tillage). The subplots were planting date (25th April, 10th May and 25th May) and density (45 000 plants ha -1 , 67 500 plant ha -1 , 90 000 plant ha -1 ). Results showed that deep loosing could retard the decrease of leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR) and dry matter accumulation (DM). Moreover, it was benefit for growth and development after florescence. Significant difference in planting date treatments demonstrated that early sowing was better than medium and late sowing. During reproductive stage, delay in planting decreased the LAI by 12.52%. With density increased, population physiological index raised.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep loosing retarded decreases in maize leaf area index, crop growth rate and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deep loosinge0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR) and dry matter accumulation (DM)e0
Direction
retard the decreasee0
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that deep loosing could retard the decrease of leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR) and dry matter accumulation (DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–568 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional tillage vs. deep loosing tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep loosing benefited maize growth and development after florescence.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
after florescencee0
Treatment
deep loosinge0
Outcome
growth and developmente0
Direction
benefite0
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that deep loosing could retard the decrease of leaf area index (LAI), crop growth rate (CGR) and dry matter accumulation (DM). Moreover, it was benefit for growth and development after florescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional tillage vs. deep loosing tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early maize sowing was significantly better than medium and late sowing.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
early sowinge0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
medium and late sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant difference in planting date treatments demonstrated that early sowing was better than medium and late sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced maize LAI by 12.52% during the reproductive stage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
reproductive stagee0
Treatment
delay in plantinge0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During reproductive stage, delay in planting decreased the LAI by 12.52%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing maize density raised the population physiological index.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
density increasede0
Outcome
population physiological indexe0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With density increased, population physiological index raised.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 38 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.