Paper · 2001 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

A New C-Type Cyclin-Dependent Kinase from Tomato Expressed in Dividing Tissues Does Not Interact with Mitotic and G1 Cyclins

Jérôme Joubès; Martine Lemaire-Chamley; Frédéric Delmas; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) form a conserved superfamily of eukaryotic serine-threonine protein kinases whose activity requires the binding of a cyclin protein. CDKs are involved in many aspects of cell biology and notably in the regulation of the cell cycle. Three cDNAs encoding a C-type CDK, and a member of each B-type CDK subfamily, were isolated from tomato (Lycopsersicon esculentum Mill.) and designated Lyces;CDKC;1 (accession no. AJ294903), Lyces; CDKB1;1 (accession no. AJ297916), and Lyces;CDKB2;1 (accession no. AJ297917). The predicted amino acid sequences displayed the characteristic PITAIRE (CDKC), PPTALRE (CDKB1), and PPTTLRE (CDKB2) motives in the cyclin-binding domain, clearly identifying the type of CDK. The accumulation of all transcripts was associated preferentially with dividing tissues in developing tomato fruit and vegetative organs. In contrast to that of CDKA and CDKBs, the transcription pattern of Lyces;CDKC;1 was shown to be independent of hormone and sugar supply in tomato cell suspension cultures and excised roots. This observation, together with the absence of a patchy expression profile in in situ hybridization experiments, suggests a non-cell cycle regulation of Lyces;CDKC;1. Using a two-hybrid assay, we showed that Lyces;CDKC;1 did not interact with mitotic and G1 cyclins. The role of plant CDKCs in the regulation of cell division and differentiation is discussed with regard to the known function of their animal counterparts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three tomato CDK cDNAs were isolated and designated.

Outcome
Three cDNAse0
Value
Threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three cDNAs encoding a C-type CDK, and a member of each B-type CDK subfamily, were isolated from tomato (Lycopsersicon esculentum Mill.) and designated Lyces;CDKC;1 (accession no. AJ294903), Lyces; CDKB1;1 (accession no. AJ297916), and Lyces;CDKB2;1 (accession no. AJ297917)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–538 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted CDK sequences carried type-identifying PITAIRE, PPTALRE and PPTTLRE motifs.

Outcome
characteristic PITAIRE (CDKC), PPTALRE (CDKB1), and PPTTLRE (CDKB2) motivese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“predicted amino acid sequences displayed the characteristic PITAIRE (CDKC), PPTALRE (CDKB1), and PPTTLRE (CDKB2) motives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–664 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three CDK transcripts preferentially accumulated in dividing developing fruit and vegetative tissues.

Organ / stage
dividing tissues in developing tomato fruit and vegetative organse0
Outcome
accumulation of all transcriptse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The accumulation of all transcripts was associated preferentially with dividing tissues in developing tomato fruit and vegetative organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lyces;CDKC;1 transcription was independent of hormone and sugar supply in cell cultures and excised roots.

Treatment
hormone and sugar supplye0
Gene
Lyces;CDKC;1e0
Outcome
transcription patterne0
Direction
independente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transcription pattern of Lyces;CDKC;1 was shown to be independent of hormone and sugar supply in tomato cell suspension cultures and excised roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lyces;CDKC;1 lacked a patchy in situ expression pattern.

Outcome
absence of a patchy expression profilee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“absence of a patchy expression profile in in situ hybridization experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1172 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The expression results suggest non-cell-cycle regulation of Lyces;CDKC;1.

Gene
Lyces;CDKC;1e0
Outcome
non-cell cycle regulatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“suggests a non-cell cycle regulation of Lyces;CDKC;1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lyces;CDKC;1 did not interact with mitotic and G1 cyclins in a two-hybrid assay.

Gene
Lyces;CDKC;1e0
Outcome
did not interact with mitotic and G1 cyclinse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Lyces;CDKC;1 did not interact with mitotic and G1 cyclins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1326 · show in text ↑

class · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.