Paper · 1987 · Experimental Agriculture

Plant Population, Rainfall and Sorghum Production in Botswana. I. Results of Experiment Station Trials

M. J. Jones

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY General mathematical relations between yield parameters, plant populations and rainfall were developed for an indigenous sorghum from the results of 28 population/row spacing trials conducted at four sites over five seasons. Populations maximizing yield increased from 25 000 to 69 000 plants ha −1 over the rainfall range 200–700 mm (pre-planting to harvest total). Tillering partly compensated for low populations but yields from 10000 plants ha −1 at 300 and 600 mm rainfall were only 80 and 61% of potential maximum, respectively. Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers and eventual panicle weights but not panicle numbers, and any yield differences were unrelated to rainfall.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield maximizing sorghum populations increased from 25 000 to 69 000 plants ha −1 across 200–700 mm rainfall.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
Populations maximizing yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25 000 to 69 000 plants ha −1e0
Setting
rainfall range 200–700 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populations maximizing yield increased from 25 000 to 69 000 plants ha −1 over the rainfall range 200–700 mm (pre-planting to harvest total).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillering partly compensated for low populations.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
Tillering partly compensated for low populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillering partly compensated for low populations but yields from 10000 plants ha −1 at 300 and 600 mm rainfall were only 80 and 61% of potential maximum, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 300 mm rainfall, yield at 10000 plants ha −1 was 80% of potential maximum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
10000 plants ha −1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
onlye0
Value
80e0
Qualifier
300e0
Comparator
potential maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillering partly compensated for low populations but yields from 10000 plants ha −1 at 300 and 600 mm rainfall were only 80 and 61% of potential maximum, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 600 mm rainfall, yield at 10000 plants ha −1 was 61% of potential maximum.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
10000 plants ha −1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
onlye0
Value
61%e0
Qualifier
600e0
Comparator
potential maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillering partly compensated for low populations but yields from 10000 plants ha −1 at 300 and 600 mm rainfall were only 80 and 61% of potential maximum, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Row spacinge0
Outcome
tiller numberse0
Comparator
constant populatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers and eventual panicle weights but not panicle numbers, and any yield differences were unrelated to rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing at constant population affected panicle weights.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Row spacinge0
Outcome
panicle weightse0
Comparator
constant populatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers and eventual panicle weights but not panicle numbers, and any yield differences were unrelated to rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing at constant population did not affect panicle numbers.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Row spacinge0
Outcome
panicle numberse0
Direction
note0
Comparator
constant populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers and eventual panicle weights but not panicle numbers, and any yield differences were unrelated to rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield differences from row spacing were unrelated to rainfall.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
unrelatede0
Setting
rainfalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers and eventual panicle weights but not panicle numbers, and any yield differences were unrelated to rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38 · show in text ↑

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.