Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Row spacing at constant population did not affect panicle numbers.

A claim from Plant Population, Rainfall and Sorghum Production in Botswana. I. Results of Experiment Station Trials · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing at constant population did not affect panicle numbers.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Row spacinge0
Outcome
panicle numberse0
Direction
note0
Comparator
constant populatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing at constant population affected tiller numbers and eventual panicle weights but not panicle numbers, and any yield differences were unrelated to rainfall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–709
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–38

Title

Plant Population, Rainfall and Sorghum Production in Botswana. I. Results of Experiment Station Trials

M. J. Jones Experimental Agriculture 1987. doi:10.1017/s0014479700017221

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e96461ff557186b88b3708d2d095feb1479d3406397d70fd69b3b0202e4484d1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

density · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

98 papers: 83 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 83 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.