Abstract
ABSTRACT The effects of hot water treatment (HWT) and modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the storage and fruit quality of cherry tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cvs. “Alona” and “Naomi”) were investigated. For this purpose, light‐red cherry tomato fruits were dipped in hot water (54C for 5 min) and subsequently stored in plastic film materials with various O 2 and CO 2 permeabilities. The cultivars used in the study were stored in a cold room at 5–7C and 90 ± 5% relative humidity (RH). The changing gas composition within the films and quality changes of the fruits were evaluated during the storage period. At the end of the study, HWT combined with MAP produced better results than MAP alone in both cultivars. Therefore, the HWT + MAP treatment proved effective with regard to fruit quality and delaying the maturity of cherry tomatoes during storage. HWT + 50 micropolyethylene (μPE) treatment produced the best result in the two cultivars at the end of the 28‐day storage with respect to the parameters evaluated in the study. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Tomato is considered a climacteric fruit, in which ripening is accompanied by a peak in respiration and a concomitant sharp increase in ethylene production, which accelerates quality loss through the physicochemical changes related to this process, such as softening and color evolution. Postharvest heating is a noncontaminating physical treatment that delays the ripening process, reduces chilling injury and controls the activity of pathogens. Because of these beneficial effects, heat treatments are currently used commercially for quality control of fresh products. Modified atmosphere packaging is another technique that has been used to prevent or retard postharvest fruit ripening and its associated biochemical and physiological changes by favorably altering the O 2 and CO 2 levels around the products. In recent years, the use of combined techniques in the postharvest handling of fresh products is increasing, and numerous authors have obtained good results using a combined treatment. Diseases have the potential to destroy the market value and utility of large amounts of fresh tomato annually. The present work evaluated a prestorage conditioning treatment to protect against these losses. The results will allow the long storage of cherry tomato, benefiting the growers, exporters, shippers and distributors of this horticultural product.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment combined with modified atmosphere packaging performed better than packaging alone for both cultivars.
- Taxon
- cherry tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformee1
- Material
- “Alona” and “Naomi”e1
- Treatment
- HWT combined with MAPe0
- Outcome
- better resultse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- MAP alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“HWT combined with MAP produced better results than MAP alone in both cultivars”
e1“cherry tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cvs. “Alona” and “Naomi”)”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment with packaging improved fruit quality during storage.
- Taxon
- cherry tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformee0
- Treatment
- HWT + MAP treatmente0
- Outcome
- fruit qualitye0
- Direction
- proved effectivee0
- Comparator
- MAP alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the HWT + MAP treatment proved effective with regard to fruit quality and delaying the maturity of cherry tomatoes during storage”
e1“HWT combined with MAP produced better results than MAP alone in both cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment with packaging delayed cherry tomato maturity during storage.
- Taxon
- cherry tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformee0
- Treatment
- HWT + MAP treatmente0
- Outcome
- maturitye0
- Direction
- delayinge0
- Comparator
- MAP alonee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the HWT + MAP treatment proved effective with regard to fruit quality and delaying the maturity of cherry tomatoes during storage”
e1“HWT combined with MAP produced better results than MAP alone in both cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
HWT with 50 micropolyethylene gave the best evaluated result after 28 days of storage in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- CHERRY TOMATOESt0
- Treatment
- HWT + 50 micropolyethylene (μPE) treatmente0
- Outcome
- best resulte0
- Direction
- beste0
- Qualifier
- at the end of the 28‐day storagee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“HWT + 50 micropolyethylene (μPE) treatment produced the best result in the two cultivars at the end of the 28‐day storage with respect to the parameters evaluated in the study”
t0“CHERRY TOMATOES”
The same questions in other papers
storage · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
heat · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
storage · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →heat · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.