Paper · 1982 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Growth, development and yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in the lowland tropics:2. Effect of reduced assimilatory capacity

T. O. Tayo

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed either at the vegetative stage, the onset of flowering, or at the rapid pod-filling stage, in order to evaluate the effect of reduced assimilatory capacity on the growth and yield characteristics of the crop. Reduction in the assimilatory capacity of the plant led to significant reduction in the vegetative growth, dry-matter accumulation and seed yield of the defoliated plants compared with the undefoliated control such that 33, 67 or 100% defoliation led to 15–55, 40–60 and 75–80% reduction in seed yield respectively, at both trials. Also, defoliation was more damaging to crop performance if carried out from the onset of flowering than at the vegetative stage. Thus, the seed yields of plants defoliated at the onset of flowering and the rapid pod-filling stage were 30–80 and 40–45 % lower than the yield from plants defoliated at the vegetative stage in both trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced assimilatory capacity significantly reduced vegetative growth, dry-matter accumulation and seed yield compared with undefoliated controls.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
Reduction in the assimilatory capacitye1
Outcome
vegetative growth, dry-matter accumulation and seed yielde1
Direction
significant reductione1
Comparator
undefoliated controle1
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduction in the assimilatory capacity of the plant led to significant reduction in the vegetative growth, dry-matter accumulation and seed yield of the defoliated plants compared with the undefoliated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

33% defoliation reduced seed yield by 15-55%.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
33, 67 or 100% defoliatione2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Value
15–55e2
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“33, 67 or 100% defoliation led to 15–55, 40–60 and 75–80% reduction in seed yield respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

67% defoliation reduced seed yield by 40-60%.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
33, 67 or 100% defoliatione2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Value
40–60e2
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“33, 67 or 100% defoliation led to 15–55, 40–60 and 75–80% reduction in seed yield respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% defoliation reduced seed yield by 75-80%.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
33, 67 or 100% defoliatione2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
reductione2
Value
75–80e2
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“33, 67 or 100% defoliation led to 15–55, 40–60 and 75–80% reduction in seed yield respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation at the onset of flowering was more damaging to crop performance than defoliation at the vegetative stage.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
defoliatione3
Outcome
crop performancee3
Direction
more damaginge3
Qualifier
from the onset of floweringe3
Comparator
vegetative stagee3
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e3

“defoliation was more damaging to crop performance if carried out from the onset of flowering than at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of plants defoliated at the onset of flowering was 30-80% lower than that of plants defoliated at the vegetative stage.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
plants defoliated at the onset of floweringe4
Outcome
seed yieldse4
Direction
lowere4
Value
30–80e4
Comparator
plants defoliated at the vegetative stagee4
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“the seed yields of plants defoliated at the onset of flowering and the rapid pod-filling stage were 30–80 and 40–45 % lower than the yield from plants defoliated at the vegetative stage in both trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–989 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of plants defoliated at the rapid pod-filling stage was 40-45% lower than that of plants defoliated at the vegetative stage.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajant0
Material
Cita-1e0
Treatment
the rapid pod-filling stagee4
Outcome
seed yieldse4
Direction
lowere4
Value
40–45e4
Comparator
plants defoliated at the vegetative stagee4
Setting
field trials in 1980e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–72 · show in text ↑
e0

“In two field trials in 1980, 33, 67 or 100% of the leaves on pigeon pea (cv. Cita-1) plants were removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“the seed yields of plants defoliated at the onset of flowering and the rapid pod-filling stage were 30–80 and 40–45 % lower than the yield from plants defoliated at the vegetative stage in both trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–989 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

stage · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.