Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of bacterial inoculant biofertilizers on growth, yield and nutrition of rice in Australia

M. L. Kecskés; A. T. M. A. Choudhury; A. V. Casteriano; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inoculant biofertilizer application increased fertilizer nitrogen (N) use efficiency in Vietnam in some previous field experiments. Similar results may be obtained in Australia. With this view in mind, a greenhouse experiment and two field experiments were conducted using a Vietnamese inoculant biofertilizer (BioGro) and several other plant growth promoting (PGP) bacteria. In the greenhouse trial, bacterial inoculations increased shoot and root weights of rice plants significantly. In the field experiments, particularly with Rhizobium leguminosarum, similar effects including significant differences in nitrogen uptake in vegetative matter were observed at the panicle initiation (PI) stage. However, these effects were not significant on grain yield at harvest and it is concluded that the much longer period of growth for Australian rice may allow compensation between treatments. Re-inoculation of plants at the PI stage, and lower application rates of N fertilizer in at least two splits are suggested for future field experiments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculations significantly increased shoot and root weights of rice plants in the greenhouse.

Treatment
bacterial inoculationse1
Outcome
shoot and root weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
greenhouse triale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In the greenhouse trial, bacterial inoculations increased shoot and root weights of rice plants significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium leguminosarum inoculation gave significant differences in nitrogen uptake in vegetative matter at panicle initiation in the field.

Organ / stage
panicle initiation (PI) stagee2
Treatment
Rhizobium leguminosarume2
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume2symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen uptake in vegetative mattere2
Setting
field experimentse2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nutrition of rice in Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the field experiments, particularly with Rhizobium leguminosarum, similar effects including significant differences in nitrogen uptake in vegetative matter were observed at the panicle initiation (PI) stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculant biofertilizers did not significantly change rice grain yield at harvest.

Treatment
bacterial inoculant biofertilizerst0
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
the much longer period of growth for Australian rice may allow compensation between treatmentse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of bacterial inoculant biofertilizers on growth, yield and nutrition of rice in Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, these effects were not significant on grain yield at harvest and it is concluded that the much longer period of growth for Australian rice may allow compensation between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–887 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest re-inoculating rice at panicle initiation and applying lower N rates in at least two splits in future field experiments.

Outcome
Re-inoculation of plants at the PI stagee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nutrition of rice in Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“Re-inoculation of plants at the PI stage, and lower application rates of N fertilizer in at least two splits are suggested for future field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1040 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 382 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.