Paper · 1992 · Annals of Applied Biology

Mango stem end rot pathogens ‐ Fruit infection by endophytic colonisation of the inflorescence and pedicel

G. I. JOHNSON; A. J. MEAD; A. W. COOKE; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
126
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The stem end rot pathogens of mango ( Mangifera indica ), ( Dothiorella dominicana, Dothiorella mangiferae, Lasiodiplodia theobromae (Syn. Diplodia natalensis Phomopsis mangiferae, Cytosphaera mangiferae, Pestalotiopsis sp. and Dothiorella ‘long’), as well as other fungi (including Alternaria alternata ), were found to occur endophytically in the stem tissue of mango trees prior to inflorescence emergence. On samples from trees with a record of low stem end rot levels, colonisation did not extend into the most recently produced flush of stem tissue. At a site with a history of high stem end rot levels, sequential monitoring of inflorescence tissue between flowering and harvest by plating out small ( c . 8 mm 3 ) tissue pieces revealed, that at least some of the pathogens ‐ Dothiorella spp., P. mangiferae, Pestalotiopsis sp. and C. mangiferae gradually colonised the inflorescence, reaching the pedicel tissue of young fruit ‐ 8 wk after flowering. Subsequently, detection frequency of the pathogens in inflorescence tissue declined, possibly because of interference from copper residues (from field sprays) accumulating on tissue samples. The detection frequency of A. alternata also increased as Dothiorella spp. declined, however these changes could not be attributed to antagonistic interactions between the two fungi. Using larger tissue pieces (1–2 mm thick transverse sections, or a square of tissue 25 mm 2 × 3 mm thick) in isolations, endophytic colonisation by Dothiorella spp. and P. mangiferae was detected in stem, inflorescence and pedicel tissues of mature‐fruit‐specimens from two different sites, one unsprayed, and the other regularly sprayed with copper. The fungi were detected more frequently in the samples from unsprayed trees. Fruit from the sprayed orchard subsequently developed a high level of stem end rot caused by D. dominicana , while a lower level of stem end rot developed in unsprayed fruit, possibly because the latter fruit were also extensively diseased by anthracnose ( Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz.). Endophytic colonisation of inflorescence and pedicel tissue was found to be a primary route of infection for fruit which develop stem end rot during ripening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem end rot pathogens of mango were found endophytically in mango stem tissue before inflorescence emergence.

Organ / stage
stem tissuee1
Interactor
stem end rot pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
found to occur endophytically in the stem tissuee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem end rot pathogens of mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 12–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“were found to occur endophytically in the stem tissue of mango trees prior to inflorescence emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–416 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In samples from trees with a record of low stem end rot, colonisation did not extend into the most recently produced flush of stem tissue.

Organ / stage
stem tissuee0
Outcome
colonisation did not extend into the most recently produced flushe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“colonisation did not extend into the most recently produced flush of stem tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–562 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a high stem end rot site, Dothiorella spp., P. mangiferae, Pestalotiopsis sp. and C. mangiferae gradually colonised the inflorescence, reaching the pedicel tissue of young fruit 8 weeks after flowering.

Interactor
Dothiorella spp.Dothiorellae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. mangiferaee0pathogen
Outcome
gradually colonised the inflorescence, reaching the pedicel tissue of young fruite0
Qualifier
8 wk after floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dothiorella
Dothiorella · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“at least some of the pathogens ‐ Dothiorella spp., P. mangiferae, Pestalotiopsis sp. and C. mangiferae gradually colonised the inflorescence, reaching the pedicel tissue of young fruit ‐ 8 wk after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–966 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detection frequency of the pathogens in inflorescence tissue subsequently declined, possibly because of interference from copper residues accumulating on samples.

Organ / stage
inflorescence tissuee0
Interactor
pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
detection frequency of the pathogense0
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
possibly because of interference from copper residuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Subsequently, detection frequency of the pathogens in inflorescence tissue declined, possibly because of interference from copper residues (from field sprays) accumulating on tissue samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The detection frequency of Alternaria alternata increased as Dothiorella spp. declined.

Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0other
Second interactor
Dothiorella spp.Dothiorellae0pathogen
Outcome
detection frequency of A. alternatae0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dothiorella
Dothiorella · Second interactorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“The detection frequency of A. alternata also increased as Dothiorella spp. declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1242 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The changes in detection of A. alternata and Dothiorella spp. could not be attributed to antagonistic interactions between the two fungi.

Outcome
could not be attributed to antagonistic interactions between the two fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“these changes could not be attributed to antagonistic interactions between the two fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With larger tissue pieces, endophytic colonisation by Dothiorella spp. and P. mangiferae was detected in stem, inflorescence and pedicel tissues of mature-fruit specimens from two sites.

Organ / stage
stem, inflorescence and pedicel tissuese0
Interactor
Dothiorella spp.Dothiorellae0pathogen
Second interactor
P. mangiferaee0pathogen
Outcome
endophytic colonisation by Dothiorella spp. and P. mangiferae was detectede0
Setting
two different sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Dothiorella
Dothiorella · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“endophytic colonisation by Dothiorella spp. and P. mangiferae was detected in stem, inflorescence and pedicel tissues of mature‐fruit‐specimens from two different sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1631 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The endophytic fungi were detected more frequently in samples from unsprayed trees than from copper-sprayed trees.

Treatment
unsprayed treese0
Outcome
fungi were detectede0
Direction
more frequentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fungi were detected more frequently in the samples from unsprayed trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from the copper-sprayed orchard developed a high level of stem end rot caused by D. dominicana, while a lower level developed in unsprayed fruit.

Treatment
regularly sprayed with coppere1
Interactor
D. dominicanae0pathogen
Outcome
stem end rote0
Direction
high levele0
Comparator
unsprayed fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit from the sprayed orchard subsequently developed a high level of stem end rot caused by D. dominicana , while a lower level of stem end rot developed in unsprayed fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1943 · show in text ↑
e1

“the other regularly sprayed with copper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1691 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophytic colonisation of inflorescence and pedicel tissue was found to be a primary route of infection for fruit that develop stem end rot during ripening.

Organ / stage
inflorescence and pedicel tissuee0
Outcome
primary route of infection for fruit which develop stem end rot during ripeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
e0

“Endophytic colonisation of inflorescence and pedicel tissue was found to be a primary route of infection for fruit which develop stem end rot during ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2223 · show in text ↑

copper atom · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.