Paper · 1952 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

The relative toxicities to plants of amine‐salt and ester formulations of 2 : 4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

K. Carpenter; R. D. Walker

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Small‐plot trials with formulations of ethyl ester and the trimethylamine salt of 2 : 4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4‐D) are described. These showed that the ester was more effective than the amine salt against individual weed species at rates of application of 1/2 lb./acre or less. The final result on mixed weed populations was considerably influenced, however, by the species present and the intensity of competition. These results are shown to be applicable on a larger scale by a brief summary of the results of more extensive field trials. Information on crop toxicity obtained from these trials shows that the ester offers a narrower safety margin but there is little risk of damage in wheat and barley if a rate of 1/2 lb./acre is not exceeded. The danger from volatility is shown to be slight in this country and the importance of formulation is very briefly discussed. Finally it is shown that these results compare fairly closely to official American recommendations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ester formulation controlled individual weed species more effectively than the amine salt at up to 1/2 lb./acre.

Treatment
estere0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
individual weed speciese0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
1/2 lb./acree0
Comparator
amine salte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ester was more effective than the amine salt against individual weed species at rates of application of 1/2 lb./acre or less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–293 · show in text ↑
e1

“damage in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–721 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed control result on mixed populations depended considerably on species composition and competition.

Interactor
mixed weed populationse0weed
Outcome
final result on mixed weed populationse0
Qualifier
species present and the intensity of competitione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The final result on mixed weed populations was considerably influenced, however, by the species present and the intensity of competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“damage in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ester offered a narrower crop safety margin than the amine salt.

Treatment
estere0
Outcome
safety margine0
Direction
narrowere0
Comparator
trimethylamine salte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ester offers a narrower safety margin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–666 · show in text ↑
e1

“ethyl ester and the trimethylamine salt of 2 : 4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4‐D)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–131 · show in text ↑
e2

“damage in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–721 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and barley had little damage risk at application rates no greater than 1/2 lb./acre.

Outcome
little risk of damagee0
Value
1/2 lb./acree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is little risk of damage in wheat and barley if a rate of 1/2 lb./acre is not exceeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatility danger from the formulation was slight in the study country.

Outcome
danger from volatilitye0
Direction
slighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The danger from volatility is shown to be slight in this country”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“damage in wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–721 · show in text ↑

ester · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ester · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.