Paper · 2014 · JOURNAL OF WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH

Weed growth, herbicide efficacy indices, crop growth and yield of wheat are modified by herbicide and cultivar interaction.

Abdul Khaliq; Muhammad Hussain; Amar Matloob; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weeds pose serious threat to wheat productivity, and chemical means are usually employed to combat weed menace in field crops. A field study was undertaken at Agronomy Research Farm, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan during Rabi 2011-12 to appraise the efficacy of some broad-spectrum herbicides against weed growth, and their influence on growth and yield of wheat. Three commonly available broad-spectrum herbicides i.e. pyaxosulam, iodosulfuron + mesosulfuran-methyle and isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester at 14.4, 14.4 and 1000 g a.i. ha -1 were applied as early post-emergence application (30 DAS) in three cultivars viz., Sehar-2006, Lasani-2008 and AARI- 2011. A tank mixture comprising of graminicide pinoxaden at 41.25 g a.i. ha -1 and broadleaf weedicide bromoxynil at 225 g a.i. ha -1 + MCPA at 225 g a.i. ha -1 was also included. Weed free and weedy check (control) plots were included for comparison. The experiment was replicated thrice in a randomized complete block design following factorial arrangement. Net plot size was 7 × 2.25 m 2 . Data regarding weed growth, treatment efficacy, wheat growth and yield was recorded following standard procedures. Weed density was significantly affected by the interaction of wheat cultivars and herbicides; however, this interaction was non-significant for weed biomass at both 60 and 90 DAS. Differences among cultivars were pronounced even in weedy check and wheat cultivar Sehar-2006 experienced less weed infestation in terms of density and biomass. Application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester produced over 90% suppression in weed density and biomass along with minimum weed and weed persistence indices and maximum herbicide efficiency. Significant improvements in wheat growth and grain yield were realized by various weed control treatments. Among herbicides, isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester proved

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and herbicide interacted significantly for weed density.

Material
wheat cultivarse0
Outcome
Weed densitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed density was significantly affected by the interaction of wheat cultivars and herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar by herbicide interaction was nonsignificant for weed biomass at 60 and 90 DAS.

Outcome
weed biomasse0
Qualifier
at both 60 and 90 DASe0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this interaction was non-significant for weed biomass at both 60 and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sehar-2006 had lower weed density and biomass in the weedy check.

Material
Sehar-2006e0
Outcome
weed infestation in terms of density and biomasse0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat cultivar Sehar-2006 experienced less weed infestation in terms of density and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus carfentrazone suppressed weed density by over 90%.

Treatment
isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl estere0
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
over 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester produced over 90% suppression in weed density and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1643 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus carfentrazone suppressed weed biomass by over 90%.

Treatment
isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl estere0
Outcome
weed biomasse1
Direction
suppressione0
Value
over 90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester produced over 90% suppression in weed density and biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1643 · show in text ↑
e1

“this interaction was non-significant for weed biomass at both 60 and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus carfentrazone gave minimum weed and weed persistence indices.

Treatment
isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl estere0
Outcome
weed and weed persistence indicese0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester produced over 90% suppression in weed density and biomass along with minimum weed and weed persistence indices and maximum herbicide efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon plus carfentrazone gave maximum herbicide efficiency.

Treatment
isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl estere0
Outcome
herbicide efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of isoproturon + carfentrazone ethyl ester produced over 90% suppression in weed density and biomass along with minimum weed and weed persistence indices and maximum herbicide efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments significantly improved wheat growth and grain yield.

Treatment
various weed control treatmentse0
Outcome
wheat growth and grain yielde0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant improvements in wheat growth and grain yield were realized by various weed control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1836 · show in text ↑

ester · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

isoproturon · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

isoproturon · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 72 positive, 2 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

ester · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

carfentrazone-ethyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.