Paper · 2007 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

pH of the Pod-zone Affects Reproductive Growth of Groundnut

M. R. Murata; G. E. Zharare; P. S. Hammes

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Most of the sandy soils that are suitable for production of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in the tropic and subtropics are acidic. Whilst effects of pH in the root zone have been studied, the effects of pod-zone pH on groundnut productivity remain relatively unknown. To develop appropriate soil management practices for groundnut production on acid soils, it is essential to understand how low pH affects reproductive growth of groundnut. Consequently, a glasshouse experiment was conducted in which attached groundnut gynophores were cultured in solution at pH ranging from 3.0 to 7.0. Low pH delayed pod initiation, and resulted in almost no pod expansion at pH 3.0. Only 12% and 55% of the cultured gynophores developed into pods at pH 3.0 and 4.0, respectively, compared with 91–95% at pH ≥ 5.0. Pods produced at pH 3.0 contained no seeds and those produced at pH 4.0 had a hollow, dark colored area in the cotyledon. Normal seeds and embryos were formed at pH ≥ 5.0, and plumule development was faster at solution pH ≥ 5.0 than at pH 4.0. Pod and kernel dry mass were optimised (90% of maximum) at pH 5.62–6.69 and 5.65–6.78, respectively. Septate and non-septate pod hairs were formed at all solution pH regimes, but were denser and more persistent at the higher pH. Kernel calcium (Ca) concentration decreased with decreasing pH, and was highly correlated with solution pH. Thus, pod-zone pH has important effects on the reproductive growth of groundnut, emphasizing the importance of managing pod-zone pH.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low pod-zone pH delayed groundnut pod initiation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Low pHe0
Outcome
pod initiatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low pH delayed pod initiation, and resulted in almost no pod expansion at pH 3.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At pH 3.0, groundnut had almost no pod expansion.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
pH 3.0e0
Outcome
pod expansione0
Direction
almost noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low pH delayed pod initiation, and resulted in almost no pod expansion at pH 3.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

12% of gynophores developed into pods at pH 3.0, compared with 91–95% at pH ≥ 5.0.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
pH 3.0e0
Outcome
developed into podse0
Direction
Onlye0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
91–95%e0
Comparator
pH ≥ 5.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 12% and 55% of the cultured gynophores developed into pods at pH 3.0 and 4.0, respectively, compared with 91–95% at pH ≥ 5.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

55% of gynophores developed into pods at 4.0, compared with 91–95% at pH ≥ 5.0.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
4.0e0
Outcome
developed into podse0
Direction
Onlye0
Value
55%e0
Qualifier
91–95%e0
Comparator
pH ≥ 5.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 12% and 55% of the cultured gynophores developed into pods at pH 3.0 and 4.0, respectively, compared with 91–95% at pH ≥ 5.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–811 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods at pH 3.0 contained no seeds.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
Podse0
Treatment
pH 3.0e0
Outcome
no seedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pods produced at pH 3.0 contained no seeds and those produced at pH 4.0 had a hollow, dark colored area in the cotyledon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pods at pH 4.0 had a hollow, dark cotyledon area.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
cotyledone0
Treatment
pH 4.0e0
Outcome
hollow, dark colored area in the cotyledone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pods produced at pH 3.0 contained no seeds and those produced at pH 4.0 had a hollow, dark colored area in the cotyledon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal seeds and embryos formed at pH ≥ 5.0.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
pH ≥ 5.0e0
Outcome
Normal seeds and embryos were formede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Normal seeds and embryos were formed at pH ≥ 5.0, and plumule development was faster at solution pH ≥ 5.0 than at pH 4.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plumule development was faster at pH ≥ 5.0 than at pH 4.0.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
solution pH ≥ 5.0e0
Outcome
plumule developmente0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
pH 4.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Normal seeds and embryos were formed at pH ≥ 5.0, and plumule development was faster at solution pH ≥ 5.0 than at pH 4.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod dry mass reached 90% of maximum at pH 5.62–6.69.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
pH 5.62–6.69e0
Outcome
Pod and kernel dry masse0
Direction
optimisede0
Value
90% of maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pod and kernel dry mass were optimised (90% of maximum) at pH 5.62–6.69 and 5.65–6.78, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

kernel dry mass reached 90% of maximum at 5.65–6.78.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
5.65–6.78e0
Outcome
kernel dry masse0
Direction
optimisede0
Value
90% of maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pod and kernel dry mass were optimised (90% of maximum) at pH 5.62–6.69 and 5.65–6.78, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Septate and non-septate pod hairs formed across all tested pH regimes.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
all solution pH regimese0
Outcome
Septate and non-septate pod hairs were formede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Septate and non-septate pod hairs were formed at all solution pH regimes, but were denser and more persistent at the higher pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod hairs were denser at higher pH.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
higher pHe0
Outcome
pod hairse0
Direction
densere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Septate and non-septate pod hairs were formed at all solution pH regimes, but were denser and more persistent at the higher pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod hairs were more persistent at higher pH.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
higher pHe0
Outcome
pod hairse0
Direction
more persistente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Septate and non-septate pod hairs were formed at all solution pH regimes, but were denser and more persistent at the higher pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel calcium concentration decreased as pH decreased.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
decreasing pHe0
Outcome
Kernel calcium (Ca) concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel calcium (Ca) concentration decreased with decreasing pH, and was highly correlated with solution pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel calcium concentration was highly correlated with solution pH.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
Kernel calcium (Ca) concentratione0
Setting
solution pHe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kernel calcium (Ca) concentration decreased with decreasing pH, and was highly correlated with solution pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 50–59 · show in text ↑

ph · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

ph · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.