Paper · 2014 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Genotypic Differences in Dry Bean Yield and Yield Components as Influenced by Nitrogen Fertilization and Rhizobia

N. K. Fageria; E. P. B. Ferreira; L. C. Melo; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is an important legume worldwide and nitrogen (N) is most yield limiting nutrients. A field experiment was conducted for two consecutive years to evaluate response of 15 dry bean genotypes to nitrogen and rhizobial inoculation. The N and rhizobia treatments were (i) control (0 kg N ha−1), (ii) seed inoculation with rhizobia strains, (iii) seed inoculation with rhizobia strains + 50 kg N ha−1, and (iv) 120 kg N ha−1. Straw yield, grain yield, and yield components were significantly influenced by N and rhizobial treatments. Grain yield, straw yield, number of pods m−2, and grain harvest index were significantly influenced by year, nitrogen + rhizobium, and genotype treatments. Year × Nitrogen + rhizobium × genotype interactions were also significant for these traits. Hence, these traits varied among genotypes with the variation in year and nitrogen + rhizobium treatments. Inoculation with rhizobium alone did not produce maximum yield and fertilizer N is required in combination with inoculation. Based on grain yield efficiency index, genotypes were classified as efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). NUE defined as grain produced per unit N applied decreased with increasing N rate. Overall, NUE was 23.17 kg grain yield kg−1 N applied at 50 kg N ha−1 and 13.33 kg grain per kg N applied at 120 kg N ha−1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen and rhizobial treatments significantly influenced straw yield, grain yield, and yield components.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
N and rhizobial treatmentse0
Outcome
Straw yield, grain yield, and yield componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Straw yield, grain yield, and yield components were significantly influenced by N and rhizobial treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year, nitrogen plus rhizobium, and genotype significantly influenced grain yield, straw yield, pods per area, and harvest index.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
nitrogen + rhizobiume0
Outcome
Grain yield, straw yield, number of pods m−2, and grain harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, straw yield, number of pods m−2, and grain harvest index were significantly influenced by year, nitrogen + rhizobium, and genotype treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year by nitrogen plus rhizobium by genotype interactions were significant for grain yield, straw yield, pods per area, and harvest index.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
Nitrogen + rhizobiume0
Outcome
Grain yield, straw yield, number of pods m−2, and grain harvest indexe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Year × Nitrogen + rhizobium × genotype interactions were also significant for these traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield, straw yield, number of pods m−2, and grain harvest index were significantly influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation alone did not produce maximum yield.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
Inoculation with rhizobium alonee0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
did not produce maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with rhizobium alone did not produce maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen was required with inoculation to obtain maximum yield.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
fertilizer N is required in combination with inoculatione0
Outcome
maximum yielde1

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer N is required in combination with inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes were classified as efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient for nitrogen use efficiency from a grain yield efficiency index.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Outcome
genotypes were classified as efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on grain yield efficiency index, genotypes were classified as efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient in nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency decreased as nitrogen rate increased.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
increasing N ratee0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“NUE defined as grain produced per unit N applied decreased with increasing N rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall nitrogen use efficiency was 23.17 kg grain yield kg−1 N applied at 50 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
50 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
NUEe0
Value
23.17 kg grain yield kg−1 N appliede0

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, NUE was 23.17 kg grain yield kg−1 N applied at 50 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall nitrogen use efficiency was 13.33 kg grain per kg N applied at 120 kg N ha−1.

Taxon
Dry Beant0
Treatment
120 kg N ha−1e0
Outcome
NUEe1
Value
13.33 kg grain per kg N appliede0

Verbatim

e0

“13.33 kg grain per kg N applied at 120 kg N ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1396 · show in text ↑
e1

“Overall, NUE was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–33 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.