Paper · 2003 · Physiologia Plantarum

A biological spectral weighting function for ozone depletion research with higher plants

Stephan D. Flint; Martyn M. Caldwell

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
255
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biological spectral weighting functions (BSWF) play a key role in assessing implications of stratospheric ozone reduction. They are used to calculate the increase in biologically effective solar UV radiation due to ozone reduction (radiation amplification factor, RAF), assess current latitudinal gradients of solar UV radiation, and compare solar UV radiation with that from lamps and filters used in experiments. As a basis for a BSWF, we developed an action spectrum for growth responses of light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings exposed to narrowband UV radiation from a large double water‐prism monochromator. Five UV wavelength peaks were used (275, 297, 302, 313 and 366 nm) in the absence of any visible radiation. Growth responses were measured from 1 to 10 days after the treatments. At all these wavelengths, the UV radiation inhibited height growth, including the height at which the first leaf separated from the stem. Radiation at all wavelengths used, except the one UV‐A wavelength, promoted the length of the second leaf. The resulting action spectrum closely resembles the commonly used generalized plant response function except that it indicates continued sensitivity into the UV‐A region. When used as a BSWF for the ozone depletion problem, this new function for plant growth would suggest substantially less impact of ozone depletion because it results in only a modest increment of biologically effective UV for a given level of ozone depletion (a lower RAF). Yet this new BSWF also suggests that experimental treatments based on previous BSWF with less emphasis on the UV‐A may have resulted in simulations of less pronounced ozone depletion than intended. The validity of this new BSWF with UV‐A sensitivity, designated the UV plant growth weighting function, was verified in field experiments as described in the companion paper.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV radiation at all tested wavelengths inhibited oat seedling height growth.

Material
Otanae0
Treatment
UV radiatione1
Outcome
height growthe1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“At all these wavelengths, the UV radiation inhibited height growth, including the height at which the first leaf separated from the stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV radiation except the UV-A wavelength promoted second leaf length.

Material
Otanae0
Treatment
Radiation at all wavelengths used, except the one UV‐A wavelengthe1
Outcome
length of the second leafe1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Radiation at all wavelengths used, except the one UV‐A wavelength, promoted the length of the second leaf.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1054 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The action spectrum resembled the generalized plant response function but retained UV-A sensitivity.

Outcome
action spectrume0
Qualifier
continued sensitivity into the UV‐A regione0
Comparator
generalized plant response functione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The resulting action spectrum closely resembles the commonly used generalized plant response function except that it indicates continued sensitivity into the UV‐A region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1225 · show in text ↑
e1

“light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The new function yields a lower radiation amplification factor and suggests less ozone depletion impact.

Outcome
impact of ozone depletione0
Direction
substantially lesse0
Qualifier
a lower RAFe0
Comparator
a given level of ozone depletione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this new function for plant growth would suggest substantially less impact of ozone depletion because it results in only a modest increment of biologically effective UV for a given level of ozone depletion (a lower RAF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The new function suggests prior experimental treatments simulated less ozone depletion than intended.

Outcome
simulations of less pronounced ozone depletione0
Comparator
than intendede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“experimental treatments based on previous BSWF with less emphasis on the UV‐A may have resulted in simulations of less pronounced ozone depletion than intended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field experiments verified the UV plant growth weighting function.

Outcome
validity of this new BSWFe0
Comparator
field experimentse0
Setting
field experimentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The validity of this new BSWF with UV‐A sensitivity, designated the UV plant growth weighting function, was verified in field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1835 · show in text ↑
e1

“light‐grown oat ( Avena sativa L. cv. Otana) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–548 · show in text ↑

uv · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.