Paper · 1963 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Control of Potato Aphids With Systemic Insecticides1

D. D. Pond

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field tests of systemic insecticide treatments on potatoes at planting were evaluated for their effect on emergence, yield, and the control of Myzus persicae (Sulzer), Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas), Aphis nasturtii Kaltenbach and Aulacorthum solani (Kaltenbach). Seed dips or carbon formulations of Di-syston® (O, O-diethyl S-[2-(ethylthio)ethyl] phosphorodithioate) or phorate delayed emergence but granular formulations of these materials did not. Dipping seed pieces before planting in a 0.5% Di-syston solution gave good control of aphids but reduced yield by almost 45%. Granular Di-system at 2 pounds active ingredient per acre gave effective control of aphids and was the only treatment consistently to produce more Grade A potatoes than the check throughout the season. A single treatment of the soil at planting time with schradan or demeton (2 pounds active per acre) gave as good or better control of aphids than either malathion or DDT sprayed on the plots such week for 9 weeks. Analysis of the tubers in late September showed that the residues from these systemic treatments did not exceed 0.03 p.p.m. in 1960 and 0.06 p.p.m. in 1961. Plants grown from daughter tubers 9 and 10 weeks after storage were not toxic to aphids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Di-syston or phorate seed dips or carbon formulations delayed potato emergence.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
Seed dips or carbon formulations of Di-syston® (O, O-diethyl S-[2-(ethylthio)ethyl] phosphorodithioate) or phoratee0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
granular formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed dips or carbon formulations of Di-syston® (O, O-diethyl S-[2-(ethylthio)ethyl] phosphorodithioate) or phorate delayed emergence but granular formulations of these materials did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–450 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular formulations did not delay emergence.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume2
Treatment
granular formulationse0
Outcome
emergencee1
Direction
did note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“granular formulations of these materials did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–450 · show in text ↑
e1

“delayed emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–397 · show in text ↑
e2

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.5% Di-syston seed-piece dip controlled aphids well.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
Dipping seed pieces before planting in a 0.5% Di-syston solutione0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control of aphidse0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping seed pieces before planting in a 0.5% Di-syston solution gave good control of aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–544 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5% Di-syston dip reduced yield by almost 45%.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
Dipping seed pieces before planting in a 0.5% Di-syston solutione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
almost 45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dipping seed pieces before planting in a 0.5% Di-syston solution gave good control of aphids but reduced yield by almost 45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–576 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular Di-system at 2 pounds active ingredient per acre controlled aphids effectively.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
Granular Di-system at 2 pounds active ingredient per acree0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control of aphidse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Granular Di-system at 2 pounds active ingredient per acre gave effective control of aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–668 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular Di-system consistently produced more Grade A potatoes than the check.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
Granular Di-system at 2 pounds active ingredient per acree1
Outcome
Grade A potatoese0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was the only treatment consistently to produce more Grade A potatoes than the check throughout the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–778 · show in text ↑
e1

“Granular Di-system at 2 pounds active ingredient per acre”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil schradan gave as good or better aphid control than weekly malathion or DDT sprays.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
schradane0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control of aphidse0
Direction
as good or bettere0
Comparator
malathion or DDTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single treatment of the soil at planting time with schradan or demeton (2 pounds active per acre) gave as good or better control of aphids than either malathion or DDT sprayed on the plots such week for 9 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil demeton gave as good or better aphid control than weekly malathion or DDT sprays.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Treatment
demeton (2 pounds active per acre)e0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
control of aphidse0
Direction
as good or bettere0
Comparator
malathion or DDTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single treatment of the soil at planting time with schradan or demeton (2 pounds active per acre) gave as good or better control of aphids than either malathion or DDT sprayed on the plots such week for 9 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–992 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic-treatment residues in tubers did not exceed 0.03 p.p.m. in 1960.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Outcome
residuese0
Direction
did not exceede0
Value
0.03 p.p.m.e0
Qualifier
in 1960e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the residues from these systemic treatments did not exceed 0.03 p.p.m. in 1960”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic-treatment residues in tubers did not exceed 0.06 p.p.m. in 1961.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Outcome
residuese0
Direction
did not exceede0
Value
0.06 p.p.m.e0
Qualifier
in 1961e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the residues from these systemic treatments did not exceed 0.03 p.p.m. in 1960 and 0.06 p.p.m. in 1961”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants from daughter tubers after storage were not toxic to aphids.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Organ / stage
daughter tuberse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
not toxic to aphidse0
Qualifier
9 and 10 weeks after storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown from daughter tubers 9 and 10 weeks after storage were not toxic to aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“potatoes at planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–70 · show in text ↑

phorate · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · Aphidomorpha · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 177 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.