Paper · 1992 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Determination of extractable and bound condensed tannin concentrations in forage plants, protein concentrate meals and cereal grains

T H Terrill; A M Rowan; G B Douglas; et al.

15
claims
17
verbatim quotes
777
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A procedure was developed for extraction of ‘free’ condensed tannins (CT) using a mixture of acetone/water/diethyl ether (4.7:2.0:3.3), followed by extraction of protein‐bound and fibre‐bound CT using boiling sodium dodecyl sulphate containing 2‐mercaptoethanol (SDS). CT concentrations in all three fractions were determined by a modified butanol‐HCI procedure. Separate standard curves using purified CT in water or SDS solution were utilised for analysis of extractable CT (water standards) and protein‐bound and fibre‐bound CT (SDS standards). The method accurately predicted the concentration of CT added to forage extracts. CT extractable in acetone/water/diethyl ether comprised, on average. 68% of total CT in a range of freeze dried forage legume samples, with most of the remainder being bound to protein. When total CT concentration was low (0.6‐3.0% DM), a lower proportion was extractable (33‐35%). In protein concentrate meals containing CT, the extractable, protein‐bound and fibre‐bound components comprised 15, 60 and 25% respectively of total CT. Total CT concentration in the forages Lotus corniculatus and Coronilla varia was considered appropriate for ruminant nutrition (2.1 and 3.0% DM). whilst CT concentration in the forage of Dorycnium spp (13–19% DM) was more suitable for soil conservation purposes. The substantial CT concentration in cottonseed meal (1.6% DM) may be involved in the high resistance of proteins in this product to ruminal degradation. CT concentration was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage, in barley and triticale grains and in soya bean meal (0.1% DM).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method accurately predicted condensed tannin added to forage extracts.

Taxon
foragee0
Outcome
concentration of CTe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The method accurately predicted the concentration of CT added to forage extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable condensed tannin averaged 68% of total tannin in forage legumes.

Taxon
forage legumee0
Outcome
CT extractablee0
Value
68%e0

Verbatim

e0

“CT extractable in acetone/water/diethyl ether comprised, on average. 68% of total CT in a range of freeze dried forage legume samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–772 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most remaining tannin in forage legumes was protein bound.

Taxon
forage legumee0
Outcome
bound to proteine0

Verbatim

e0

“CT extractable in acetone/water/diethyl ether comprised, on average. 68% of total CT in a range of freeze dried forage legume samples, with most of the remainder being bound to protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low total tannin concentration, the extractable proportion was 33–35%.

Taxon
forage plantst0
Material
forage plantst0
Outcome
proportion was extractablee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
33‐35%e0
Qualifier
0.6‐3.0% DMe0

Verbatim

e0

“When total CT concentration was low (0.6‐3.0% DM), a lower proportion was extractable (33‐35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“forage plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extractable tannin comprised 15% of total tannin in protein concentrate meals.

Outcome
extractablee0
Value
15e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In protein concentrate meals containing CT, the extractable, protein‐bound and fibre‐bound components comprised 15, 60 and 25% respectively of total CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein bound tannin comprised 60% of total tannin in protein concentrate meals.

Outcome
protein‐bounde0
Value
60e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In protein concentrate meals containing CT, the extractable, protein‐bound and fibre‐bound components comprised 15, 60 and 25% respectively of total CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre bound tannin comprised 25% of total tannin in protein concentrate meals.

Outcome
fibre‐bounde0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In protein concentrate meals containing CT, the extractable, protein‐bound and fibre‐bound components comprised 15, 60 and 25% respectively of total CT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1073 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lotus corniculatus forage had 2.1% DM total tannin, considered appropriate for ruminant nutrition.

Taxon
Lotus corniculatusLotus corniculatuse0
Outcome
Total CT concentratione0
Value
2.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus corniculatus
Lotus corniculatus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total CT concentration in the forages Lotus corniculatus and Coronilla varia was considered appropriate for ruminant nutrition (2.1 and 3.0% DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coronilla varia forage had 3.0% DM total tannin, considered appropriate for ruminant nutrition.

Taxon
Coronilla variaSecurigera variae0
Outcome
Total CT concentratione0
Value
3.0% DMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Securigera varia
Securigera varia · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total CT concentration in the forages Lotus corniculatus and Coronilla varia was considered appropriate for ruminant nutrition (2.1 and 3.0% DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1219 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dorycnium forage tannin concentration was 13–19% DM and was considered better suited to soil conservation.

Taxon
Dorycnium sppLotuse0
Outcome
CT concentratione0
Value
13–19% DMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT concentration in the forage of Dorycnium spp (13–19% DM) was more suitable for soil conservation purposes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1336 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cottonseed meal contained 1.6% DM condensed tannin, potentially related to resistance of proteins to ruminal degradation.

Taxon
cottonseede0
Material
cottonseed meale0
Outcome
resistance of proteinse0
Value
1.6% DMe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The substantial CT concentration in cottonseed meal (1.6% DM) may be involved in the high resistance of proteins in this product to ruminal degradation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Condensed tannin was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage.

Taxon
perennial ryegrassLolium perennee0
Outcome
CT concentratione0
Direction
indistinguishable from zeroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT concentration was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage, in barley and triticale grains and in soya bean meal (0.1% DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Condensed tannin was indistinguishable from zero in barley grains.

Outcome
CT concentratione0
Direction
indistinguishable from zeroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT concentration was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage, in barley and triticale grains and in soya bean meal (0.1% DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Condensed tannin was indistinguishable from zero in triticale grains.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
CT concentratione0
Direction
indistinguishable from zeroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CT concentration was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage, in barley and triticale grains and in soya bean meal (0.1% DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soya bean meal contained 0.1% DM condensed tannin, indistinguishable from zero.

Taxon
soya beane0
Outcome
CT concentratione0
Direction
indistinguishable from zeroe0
Value
0.1% DMe0

Verbatim

e0

“CT concentration was indistinguishable from zero in perennial ryegrass forage, in barley and triticale grains and in soya bean meal (0.1% DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1632 · show in text ↑