Paper · 2012 · Sustainable Agriculture Research

The Effects of Extracts of Lantana camara (L.) and Azadirachta indica (A. Juss) on the Population Dynamics of Plutella xylostella, Brevicoryne brassicae and Hellula undalis on Cabbage

P. K. Baidoo; J. I. Adam

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of ethanolic extract of neem, Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae), seeds and petroleum ether extract of Lantana camara leaves (Verbenaceae) on the populations of three cabbage pests, Plutella xylostella, Brevicoryne brassicae and Hellula undalis were studied. The study was conducted between January and April 2008. Extracts of the two plants were sprayed on cabbage plants to control these pests. A standard synthetic chemical insecticide (Mektin) was used as reference product. The experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design and each treatment was replicated four times. The effects of plant extracts on the population dynamics of the pests’ species, the level of infestation and yield were assessed. Significantly more of the pests infested the control plants than the treated plants (P< 0.01). The mean weight of cabbage heads on the sprayed plots was significantly heavier than that of the control unsprayed plots. The use of A. indica seeds and L. camara leaf extracts increased yield by 37.05% and 25.80%, respectively. Spraying the cabbage plants with the plant extracts significantly reduced the numbers of pests compared with the control plants. The use of these plant extracts can be incorporated into an overall control programme of these pests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control cabbage plants carried significantly more pests than extract-treated plants.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
pestse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly more of the pests infested the control plants than the treated plants (P< 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayed cabbage plots had significantly heavier heads than unsprayed controls.

Treatment
sprayed plotse0
Outcome
mean weight of cabbage headse0
Direction
heaviere0
Comparator
control unsprayed plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean weight of cabbage heads on the sprayed plots was significantly heavier than that of the control unsprayed plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachta indica seed extract increased cabbage yield by 37.05%.

Treatment
A. indica seedse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.05%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of A. indica seeds and L. camara leaf extracts increased yield by 37.05% and 25.80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lantana camara leaf extract increased cabbage yield by 25.80%.

Treatment
L. camara leaf extractse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.80%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The use of A. indica seeds and L. camara leaf extracts increased yield by 37.05% and 25.80%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying plant extracts significantly reduced pest numbers relative to control plants.

Treatment
plant extractse0
Outcome
numbers of pestse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the cabbage plants with the plant extracts significantly reduced the numbers of pests compared with the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1181 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend incorporating neem and lantana extracts into a pest-control programme.

Treatment
these plant extractse0
Outcome
overall control programme of these pestse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The use of these plant extracts can be incorporated into an overall control programme of these pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1283 · show in text ↑

Azadirachta indica · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 59 positive, 1 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 65 positive, 13 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.