Paper · 2010 · Plant Health Progress

Integrating Planting Dates and Fungicide Applications for Managing White Mold of Dry Beans in Western Nebraska

Robert M. Harveson; James R. Steadman; Carlos A. Urrea

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

White mold, caused by the soilborne fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is one of the most destructive diseases of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and is greatly influenced by environmental conditions and certain agronomic practices. A 3-year study (2003 to 2005) evaluated planting date and thiophanate-methyl fungicide applications based on decision aids consisting of blue plate technique, sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) disease forecasting model, and crop phenology (90% bloom). Overall yields were lower in 2003 and higher in 2005, and disease severity was greater in 2004. Planting dry beans in late June to early July resulted in higher levels of disease than planting in late May or mid-June in 2004. Late planting also resulted in lower yields and 100-seed weight in 2004 and 2005 than the early and mid-plantings. Compared to the control and CLS model, fungicide applications based on the blue plate and 90% bloom treatments reduced disease severity in 2004 and 2005, while also increasing 100-seed weight and yields in 2004. Accepted for publication 8 May 2010. Published 1 July 2010.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields were lower in 2003 and higher in 2005.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Setting
2003e0

Verbatim

e0

“Overall yields were lower in 2003 and higher in 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields were higher in 2005.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
2005e0

Verbatim

e0

“Overall yields were lower in 2003 and higher in 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White mold severity was greater in 2004.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
2004e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease severity was greater in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“White mold, caused by the soilborne fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is one of the most destructive diseases of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late June or early July planting caused more disease than late May or mid June planting in 2004.

Taxon
dry beanse0
Treatment
late June to early Julye0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt1pathogen
Outcome
levels of diseasee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
late May or mid-Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting dry beans in late June to early July resulted in higher levels of disease than planting in late May or mid-June in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“White mold, caused by the soilborne fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is one of the most destructive diseases of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting reduced yield versus early and mid planting in 2004 and 2005.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Treatment
Late plantinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
early and mid-plantingse0

Verbatim

e0

“Late planting also resulted in lower yields and 100-seed weight in 2004 and 2005 than the early and mid-plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting reduced 100 seed weight versus early and mid planting in 2004 and 2005.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Treatment
Late plantinge0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
early and mid-plantingse0

Verbatim

e0

“Late planting also resulted in lower yields and 100-seed weight in 2004 and 2005 than the early and mid-plantings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue plate timed fungicide reduced disease severity versus control and CLS model.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Treatment
fungicide applications based on the blue platee0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control and CLS modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control and CLS model, fungicide applications based on the blue plate and 90% bloom treatments reduced disease severity in 2004 and 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“White mold, caused by the soilborne fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is one of the most destructive diseases of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ninety percent bloom timed fungicide reduced disease severity versus control and CLS model.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Treatment
90% bloom treatmentse0
Interactor
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorumt1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control and CLS modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control and CLS model, fungicide applications based on the blue plate and 90% bloom treatments reduced disease severity in 2004 and 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
t1

“White mold, caused by the soilborne fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, is one of the most destructive diseases of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue plate timed fungicide increased seed weight and yield in 2004.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Treatment
fungicide applications based on the blue platee0
Outcome
100-seed weight and yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide applications based on the blue plate and 90% bloom treatments reduced disease severity in 2004 and 2005, while also increasing 100-seed weight and yields in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ninety percent bloom timed fungicide increased seed weight and yield in 2004.

Taxon
dry beanst0
Treatment
90% bloom treatmentse0
Outcome
100-seed weight and yieldse0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide applications based on the blue plate and 90% bloom treatments reduced disease severity in 2004 and 2005, while also increasing 100-seed weight and yields in 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–90 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

sowing time · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fungicide · Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.