Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In these small experiments with low infection levels, fungicide use did not significantly increase yield or yield components.

A claim from Chemical control of chocolate spot disease of field beans · 1980

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In these small experiments with low infection levels, fungicide use did not significantly increase yield or yield components.

Taxon
field beanse0
Treatment
fungicidese4
Outcome
yield or yield componentse4
Direction
did not result in significant increasese4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“chocolate spot ( Botrytis fabae ) disease of field beans ( Vicia faba )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–144
e4

“the use of fungicides did not result in significant increases in yield or yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–986

Title

Chemical control of chocolate spot disease of field beans

Severa A. Doto; W. J. Whittington The Journal of Agricultural Science 1980. doi:10.1017/s0021859600028483

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-22b835d1cb4faa8a35825a72b57744a64ac42a7f6d36a76bda54628eafdc25cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fungicide · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Fungicide applications increased bean yield by 32 to 41%.

    White mold intensity on common bean in response to plant density, irrigation frequency, grass mulching, Trichoderma spp., and fungicide · 2009

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Fungicide increased pinto bean yield by 33%.

    Impact of White Mold Incidence on Dry Bean Yield Under Nonirrigated Conditions · 2004

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Fungicides significantly increased pod yield relative to untreated plots in 2015 only.

    Sensitivity and Efficacy of Boscalid, Fluazinam, and Thiophanate-Methyl for White Mold Control in Snap Bean in New York · 2017 · compared with nontreated plots

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Treatment with the control agents and fungicide significantly improved common bean growth and yield characteristics.

    Resistance Induction and Direct Antifungal Activity of Some Monoterpenes against Rhizoctonia solani, the Causal of Root Rot in Common Bean · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Fluazinam fungicide increased common bean yield by 31% compared with an untreated water control.

    Foliar application of calcium chloride and calcium silicate decreases white mold intensity on dry beans · 2009 · compared with water (untreated control)

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Fungicide increased bean yield by 156.2% compared with unsprayed plants.

    Photosynthetic Gas Exchange in Common Bean Submitted to Foliar Sprays of Potassium Silicate, Sodium Molybdate and Fungicide and Infected with Colletotrichum lindemuthianum · 2014 · compared with non‐sprayed ones

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Blue plate timed fungicide increased seed weight and yield in 2004.

    Integrating Planting Dates and Fungicide Applications for Managing White Mold of Dry Beans in Western Nebraska · 2010

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Fungicide increased seed yield by 87.7% over the untreated control.

    INDUCTION OF RESISTANCE AGAINST RHIZOCTONIA ROOT ROT OF COMMON BEAN · 2015 · compared with untreated control

    Opposite direction

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.