Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Tillage, Fertilizer and Sorghum/Desmodium Intercrop Cultivation on Soils’ Quality and Yield of Sorghum in an Alfisol of a Northern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria

Odunze Chidowe; Tseja Joshua; Abu Sunday; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil quality protection under intensive land use and fast economic development has become a major challenge for sustainable resource use in the developing countries such as Nigeria. Conventional tillage practice is commonly practiced at land preparation and effect of this on soil quality for sustainable productivity was investigated in this study, in comparison with No Till, Conservation tillage, and split old ridge practices in combination with four nitrogen and three phosphorus fertilizer rates. Sorghum was the test crop. Results show that the soils were initially acid (pH 5.0 to 6.0), had low organic carbon (2.3 to 2.5gkg -1 ), total nitrogen (0.05gkg -1 ) and low to moderate available phosphorus (6.7 to 8.5mgkg -1 ) and needed restoration to support sustainable agricultural production. Tillage, sorghum/ Desmodium and N and P fertilizer managements imposed showed that No Till practice (SDNT) sequestered significantly (P<0.05) higher organic carbon value (6.9 gkg -1 ), followed by Conservation tillage with incorporated and relayed D. Uncinatum

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial experimental soils were acidic.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume1
Outcome
soils were initially acide0
Value
pH 5.0 to 6.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soils were initially acid (pH 5.0 to 6.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum was the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No Till practice sequestered significantly more soil organic carbon.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume1
Treatment
No Till practice (SDNT)e0
Outcome
organic carbon valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.9 gkg -1e0
Comparator
Conservation tillagee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No Till practice (SDNT) sequestered significantly (P<0.05) higher organic carbon value (6.9 gkg -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sorghum was the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–528 · show in text ↑
e2

“in comparison with No Till, Conservation tillage, and split old ridge practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–429 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.