Abstract
Abstract This study was carried out during 2006–07 in oil rose ( Rosa damascena ) production areas in the Lakes region of Turkey. During the months of April and August, leaf samples showing virus and virus‐like symptoms were collected periodically from rose plantations. During surveys, photos of typical virus symptoms were taken. A total of 218 samples from 10 oil rose growing plantations were collected. All samples were tested for Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV), Arabis mosaic virus (ArMV), and Apple mosaic virus (ApMV) using double‐antibody sandwich enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (DAS–ELISA). Among the samples tested, ArMv, PNRSV, and ApMV were found in 51.8%, 35.7%, and 17.8% of the collection, respectively. Serological tests also indicate that ArMV is the most common virus on oil rose varieties. Mixed infections of ArMV+PNRSV, ArMV+ApMV, PNRSV+ApMV, and ArMV+PNRSV+ApMV were also detected in the rose samples tested. An infection by ArMV, PNRSV, and ApMV, either singly or in combination, is usually responsible for rose mosaic disease. However, mixed infections of PNRSV and ArMV were detected in 54 rose samples tested. Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plants produced systemic vein banding on Cucumis sativus , chlorotic local lesions on French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), and systemic mosaic on cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata ). Inoculation with extracts from PNRSV‐positive plants produced systemic mosaic, stunting, and vein banding on C. sativus , and necrotic local lesions on cowpea. Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plants produced necrotic local lesions on Chenopodium amaranticolor and Chenopodium quinoa , and chlorotic local lesions, mottling, and systemic mosaic on C. sativus . As a result, the existence of ArMV, PNRSV, and ApMV were found in this region. This is the first study of the occurrence and incidence of ApMV on oil rose in Turkey. In addition, symptoms caused by Rose spring dwarf virus and Rose rosette virus were observed in these plantations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV was detected in 51.8% of sampled oil roses.
Verbatim
e0“ArMv, PNRSV, and ApMV were found in 51.8%, 35.7%, and 17.8% of the collection, respectively.”
t0“oil rose”
Claim · model-written summary
PNRSV was detected in 35.7% of sampled oil roses.
- Taxon
- oil roset0
- Interactor
- PNRSV
.jpg?width=60)
Prunus necrotic ringspot viruse0pathogen - Outcome
- PNRSVe0
- Value
- 35.7%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“ArMv, PNRSV, and ApMV were found in 51.8%, 35.7%, and 17.8% of the collection, respectively.”
t0“oil rose”
Claim · model-written summary
ApMV was detected in 17.8% of sampled oil roses.
- Taxon
- oil roset0
- Interactor
- ApMV
Ilarvirus ApMVe0pathogen - Outcome
- ApMVe0
- Value
- 17.8%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ArMv, PNRSV, and ApMV were found in 51.8%, 35.7%, and 17.8% of the collection, respectively.”
t0“oil rose”
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV was the most common virus on oil rose varieties.
Verbatim
e0“ArMV is the most common virus on oil rose varieties.”
t0“oil rose”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixed ArMV and PNRSV infection was detected in 54 rose samples.
- Taxon
- oil roset0
- Interactor
- PNRSVPrunus necrotic ringspot viruse0pathogen
- Second interactor
- ArMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- mixed infections of PNRSV and ArMVe0
- Value
- 54 rose samplese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mixed infections of PNRSV and ArMV were detected in 54 rose samples tested.”
t0“oil rose”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with ArMV-positive extracts produced systemic vein banding on cucumber.
- Taxon
- Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativuse0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plantse0
- Interactor
- ArMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- systemic vein bandinge0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plants produced systemic vein banding on Cucumis sativus”
e1“ArMV‐positive plants produced systemic vein banding on Cucumis sativus”
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV-positive extracts caused chlorotic local lesions on French bean.
- Taxon
- French bean
Phaseolus vulgarise0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plantse1
- Interactor
- ArMVe1pathogen
- Outcome
- chlorotic local lesionse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chlorotic local lesions on French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris )”
e1“Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plants produced systemic vein banding on Cucumis sativus , chlorotic local lesions on French bean”
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV-positive extracts caused systemic mosaic on cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plantse0
- Interactor
- ArMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- systemic mosaice0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from ArMV‐positive plants produced systemic vein banding on Cucumis sativus , chlorotic local lesions on French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ), and systemic mosaic on cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata )”
Claim · model-written summary
PNRSV-positive extracts produced systemic mosaic, stunting and vein banding on cucumber.
- Taxon
- C. sativusCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from PNRSV‐positive plantse0
- Interactor
- PNRSVPrunus necrotic ringspot viruse0pathogen
- Outcome
- systemic mosaic, stunting, and vein bandinge0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from PNRSV‐positive plants produced systemic mosaic, stunting, and vein banding on C. sativus”
e1“Cucumis sativus”
Claim · model-written summary
PNRSV-positive extracts produced necrotic local lesions on cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from PNRSV‐positive plantse0
- Interactor
- PNRSVPrunus necrotic ringspot viruse0pathogen
- Outcome
- necrotic local lesionse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from PNRSV‐positive plants produced systemic mosaic, stunting, and vein banding on C. sativus , and necrotic local lesions on cowpea.”
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV-positive extracts produced necrotic local lesions on Chenopodium amaranticolor.
- Taxon
- Chenopodium amaranticolor
Chenopodium amaranticolore0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plantse0
- Interactor
- ArMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- necrotic local lesionse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plants produced necrotic local lesions on Chenopodium amaranticolor and Chenopodium quinoa”
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV-positive extracts produced necrotic local lesions on Chenopodium quinoa.
- Taxon
- Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoae0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plantse0
- Interactor
- ArMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- necrotic local lesionse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plants produced necrotic local lesions on Chenopodium amaranticolor and Chenopodium quinoa”
Claim · model-written summary
ArMV-positive extracts produced chlorotic local lesions, mottling and systemic mosaic on cucumber.
- Taxon
- C. sativusCucumis sativuse0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plantse0
- Interactor
- ArMVe0pathogen
- Outcome
- chlorotic local lesions, mottling, and systemic mosaice0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with extracts from ArMV–positive plants produced necrotic local lesions on Chenopodium amaranticolor and Chenopodium quinoa , and chlorotic local lesions, mottling, and systemic mosaic on C. sativus”
Claim · model-written summary
Rose spring dwarf virus symptoms were observed in plantations.
Verbatim
e0“symptoms caused by Rose spring dwarf virus and Rose rosette virus were observed in these plantations.”
t0“oil rose”
Claim · model-written summary
Rose rosette virus symptoms were observed in plantations.
- Taxon
- oil roset0
- Interactor
- Rose rosette virus
Emaravirus rosaee0pathogen - Outcome
- Rose rosette viruse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“symptoms caused by Rose spring dwarf virus and Rose rosette virus were observed in these plantations.”
t0“oil rose”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · disease · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
botanical · disease · Chenopodium amaranticolorPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →botanical · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →inoculation · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →botanical · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →botanical · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →inoculation · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →inoculation · disease · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
79 papers more in this group
See all 83 papers →8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.