Paper · 1980 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Control of Elongation and Thickening Growth of Primary Shoots and Primary Lateral Shoots in ^|^lsquo;Kyoho^|^rsquo; Grapes by CCC

Takafumi TEZUKA; Hironori SEKIYA; Hajime OHNO

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A morphological alteration of ‘Kyoho’ grapevines by CCC [(2-chloroethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride] was studied. CCC retarded elongation of primary shoots and primary lateral shoots. The former was due to a retardation of cell division and cell elongation, the latter mainly to a suppression of cell division. Effects of CCC were different from tissue to tissue of the grapevines. In the pith, both cell elongation and cell division were depressed by CCC, but in the starch sheath located in inner cortex, cell division was mainly depressed by CCC. The internodes and nodes were thickened by treatment with CCC. The thickening growth of internodes of the primary shoots with CCC was based on a remarkable development of xylem in particular and of phloem. The thickening growth of the primary lateral shoots with CCC was also similar to that of the primary shoots, but was not remarkable as compared with the primary shoots. Development of tendrils of the primary shoots were inhibited with CCC. Those of the primary lateral shoots were also scarcely induced with CCC as well as treatment without CCC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC retarded elongation of primary shoots in Kyoho grapevines.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
elongation of primary shootse0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“CCC retarded elongation of primary shoots and primary lateral shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC retarded elongation of primary lateral shoots.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
primary lateral shootse0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“CCC retarded elongation of primary shoots and primary lateral shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–184 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary shoot elongation retardation was attributed to slower cell division and elongation.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
retardation of cell division and cell elongatione0
Qualifier
cell division and cell elongatione0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“The former was due to a retardation of cell division and cell elongation, the latter mainly to a suppression of cell division.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–311 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary lateral shoot elongation retardation was mainly attributed to suppression of cell division.

Taxon
Grapest0
Outcome
suppression of cell divisione0
Qualifier
cell divisione0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“The former was due to a retardation of cell division and cell elongation, the latter mainly to a suppression of cell division.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC depressed cell elongation and division in the pith.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
pithe0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
cell elongation and cell divisione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the pith, both cell elongation and cell division were depressed by CCC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC mainly depressed cell division in the starch sheath.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
starch sheathe0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
cell divisione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the starch sheath located in inner cortex, cell division was mainly depressed by CCC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–549 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC thickened internodes and nodes.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
internodes and nodese0
Direction
thickenede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“The internodes and nodes were thickened by treatment with CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–613 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC induced marked xylem and phloem development in primary shoot internodes.

Taxon
Grapest0
Organ / stage
internodes of the primary shootse0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
remarkable development of xylem in particular and of phloeme0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“The thickening growth of internodes of the primary shoots with CCC was based on a remarkable development of xylem in particular and of phloem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC caused less remarkable thickening in primary lateral shoots than in primary shoots.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
thickening growth of the primary lateral shootse0
Direction
not remarkablee0
Comparator
primary shootse0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“The thickening growth of the primary lateral shoots with CCC was also similar to that of the primary shoots, but was not remarkable as compared with the primary shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC inhibited tendril development on primary shoots.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
Development of tendrils of the primary shootse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Development of tendrils of the primary shoots were inhibited with CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tendrils on primary lateral shoots were scarcely induced with or without CCC.

Taxon
Grapest0
Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
primary lateral shootse0
Direction
scarcely inducede0
Comparator
treatment without CCCe0

Verbatim

t0

“Grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Those of the primary lateral shoots were also scarcely induced with CCC as well as treatment without CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1102 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · growth · VitisResults differ

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.