Abstract

Intercropping combines different aspects of the interaction between organisms in ecosystems and may be classified as a pro-ecological method of plant cultivation limiting the harmful human interference in the environment, especially the use of chemicals. It also allows high yield, good quality, and economic productivity to be achieved. The aim of the present study, conducted in the years 2003–2004 in Mydlniki near Kraków, was to determine the effect of intercropping carrot Nardin F1 with French marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) 'Kolombina' and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) 'Promyk' on carrot yield, its quality, and the occurrence of pests. On average in both years of the study, intercropping did not reduce total or marketable carrot yield. In 2003 intercropping contributed to a significant increase in marketable yield compared with yield from sole cropping. In 2004 the dry matter content was higher in the roots of carrots grown with pot marigold. The treatments intercropped with both French and pot marigold were characterized by an increased content of sugars in carrot roots and in 2004 year – of carotenoids. Intercropping had a significant effect on the number of roots damaged by the carrot rust fly, Psila rosae, (the best in this respect was the combination with Tagetes) and by nematodes (the best in this respect was the combination with Calendula). The number of larvae of carrot psyllid, Trioza viridula, was significantly lower in the plots where carrot was intercropped. The study did not find intercropping to have a positive effect on reducing the occurrence of the root aphid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not reduce total carrot yield across both years.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average in both years of the study, intercropping did not reduce total or marketable carrot yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not reduce marketable carrot yield across both years.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
marketable carrot yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average in both years of the study, intercropping did not reduce total or marketable carrot yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping increased marketable carrot yield significantly in 2003 relative to sole cropping.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
marketable yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
In 2003e0
Comparator
sole croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2003 intercropping contributed to a significant increase in marketable yield compared with yield from sole cropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot marigold intercropping raised carrot root dry matter in 2004.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
grown with pot marigolde0
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
In 2004e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2004 the dry matter content was higher in the roots of carrots grown with pot marigold.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French marigold intercropping raised carrot root sugar content.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Frenche0
Outcome
content of sugars in carrot rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments intercropped with both French and pot marigold were characterized by an increased content of sugars in carrot roots and in 2004 year – of carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot marigold intercropping raised carrot root sugar content.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
pot marigolde0
Outcome
content of sugars in carrot rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments intercropped with both French and pot marigold were characterized by an increased content of sugars in carrot roots and in 2004 year – of carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

French marigold intercropping raised carrot root carotenoids in 2004.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Frenche0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments intercropped with both French and pot marigold were characterized by an increased content of sugars in carrot roots and in 2004 year – of carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pot marigold intercropping raised carrot root carotenoids in 2004.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
pot marigolde0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments intercropped with both French and pot marigold were characterized by an increased content of sugars in carrot roots and in 2004 year – of carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tagetes intercropping best reduced carrot roots damaged by carrot rust fly.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Tagetese0
Interactor
Psila rosaeChamaepsila rosaee0pest
Outcome
number of roots damaged by the carrot rust fly, Psila rosaee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chamaepsila rosae
Chamaepsila rosae · InteractorEmanuele Santarelli · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping had a significant effect on the number of roots damaged by the carrot rust fly, Psila rosae, (the best in this respect was the combination with Tagetes)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calendula intercropping best reduced carrot roots damaged by nematodes.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Calendulae0
Interactor
nematodesNematodae0pest
Outcome
nematodese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and by nematodes (the best in this respect was the combination with Calendula).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrot psyllid larvae were significantly fewer in intercropped plots.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Interactor
Trioza viridulae0pest
Outcome
number of larvae of carrot psyllid, Trioza viridulae0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of larvae of carrot psyllid, Trioza viridula, was significantly lower in the plots where carrot was intercropped.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping did not positively reduce root aphid occurrence.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Interactor
root aphide0pest
Outcome
occurrence of the root aphide0
Direction
did not finde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study did not find intercropping to have a positive effect on reducing the occurrence of the root aphid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of intercropping carrot (Daucus carota L.) with french marigold (Tagetes patula nana L.) and pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.) on the occurrence of some pests and quality of carrot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–199 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.