Paper · 1987 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of changes in moisture profiles of a transitional red-brown earth with surface and slotted gypsum applications on the development and yield of a wheat crop

NS Jayawardane; J Blackwell; M Stapper

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The low productivity of transitional red-brown earths for flood irrigated upland cropping is associated with their low infiltration rates and inadequate aeration of the root zone. The effect of the measured changes in the moisture and aeration profiles with surface and slotted gypsum applications on growth and development of a wheat crop was evaluated in a preliminary field study, on non-replicated plots.The patterns of changes in moisture profiles in the gypsum slotted plots were similar to those observed in the previous season, namely, deeper preferential wetting and faster internal drainage through the slots. This resulted in lower volumetric moisture contents in the slots and in the surface and subsurface layers between slots, compared to the non-slotted plots.The critical moisture contents were defined for each soil depth at which an air-filled porosity of 0.08 mm3 mm-3 was reached. For the transitional red-brown earth used in this study, air-filled porosity needs to be larger than 0.08 mm3 mm-3 to provide a soil pathway for oxygen flow to roots. The moisture profiles in the no-gypsum, surface gypsum and slotted gypsum plots measured throughout the cropping season indicated the period of time when oxygen flow through different soil layers was likely to be restricted. The moisture contents were higher than the critical value in the surface and subsurface layers of the non-slotted plots, particularly in the plot with no gypsum applications, during a period in winter with prolonged rainfall and low evapotranspiration rates. This resulted in reductions in the rates of phasic development, tillering, canopy closure and dry matter production and finally lower yields in the non-slotted plots, especially in the plot without gypsum. Differences in grain yields were mainly due to differences in the number of spikes m-2.During the second half of the growing season higher potential evapotranspiration, lower rainfall and accurate irrigation scheduling resulted in the moisture contents being maintained below the critical limits at all depths in all plots. Consequently, the two yield components which were determined during this period, namely, the number of kernels per spike and kernel weight, showed only slight variations between plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-slotted plots without gypsum had reduced rates of phasic development, tillering, canopy closure and dry matter production in wheat.

Treatment
surface and slotted gypsum applicationse0
Outcome
phasic development, tillering, canopy closure and dry matter productione1
Direction
reductionse1
Qualifier
during a period in winter with prolonged rainfall and low evapotranspiration ratese4
Comparator
non-slotted plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surface and slotted gypsum applications on growth and development of a wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–339 · show in text ↑
e1

“This resulted in reductions in the rates of phasic development, tillering, canopy closure and dry matter production and finally lower yields in the non-slotted plots, especially in the plot without gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1756 · show in text ↑
e4

“during a period in winter with prolonged rainfall and low evapotranspiration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-slotted plots, especially without gypsum, gave lower wheat yields.

Treatment
gypsume1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
especially in the plot without gypsume1
Comparator
non-slotted plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surface and slotted gypsum applications on growth and development of a wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–339 · show in text ↑
e1

“This resulted in reductions in the rates of phasic development, tillering, canopy closure and dry matter production and finally lower yields in the non-slotted plots, especially in the plot without gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1756 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in wheat grain yield were mainly due to differences in the number of spikes per square metre.

Outcome
grain yieldse2
Qualifier
mainly due to differences in the number of spikes m-2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surface and slotted gypsum applications on growth and development of a wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–339 · show in text ↑
e2

“Differences in grain yields were mainly due to differences in the number of spikes m-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1844 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of kernels per spike and kernel weight of wheat showed only slight variations between plots.

Outcome
the number of kernels per spike and kernel weighte3
Qualifier
showed only slight variations between plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“surface and slotted gypsum applications on growth and development of a wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–339 · show in text ↑
e3

“the number of kernels per spike and kernel weight, showed only slight variations between plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2171–2265 · show in text ↑

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.