Paper · 1990 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Maize (Zea mays) response to nitrogen fertiliser on an ultisol in southern nigeria under two tillage and mulch treatments

Joe S C Mbagwu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The response of maize to four rates of nitrogen (N) fertiliser (0, 60, 120 and 240 kg N ha −1 ) on an ultisol in south‐eastern Nigeria was evaluated under two tillage and two mulch treatments. Differences in plant height, leaf area index and grain yield between the conventionally tilled and zero‐tillage treatments were not significant at P < 0.05, but the mulched plots out‐yielded the unmulched plots by 23–46% during the drier seasons. On each tillage‐mulch combination, grain yield response to nitrogen was of a quadratic polynomial form, indicating that maximum yields occurred at 123, 139, 130 and 142 kg N ha −1 on the tilled‐mulched, tilled‐unmulched, untilled‐mulched and untilled‐unmulched plots, respectively. Nitrogen use efficiency (grain yield per kg N applied) decreased in the order tilled‐mulched (32.6) > untilled‐mulched (30.9) > untilled‐unmulched (27.8) > tilled‐unmulched (22.4) where the figures in parentheses represent nitrogen use efficiency (kg kg −1 ). For each tillage treatment maximum soil temperature was higher and moisture retained at 2 and 10 days after saturation lower on the unmulched than mulched plots. Percentage moisture loss between these days was 45.5, 83.3, 25.0 and 55.6 respectively, on the tilled‐mulched, tilled‐unmulched, untilled‐mulched and untilled‐unmulched plots. The untilled‐mulched plots had the highest contents of residual organic carbon and total N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage did not significantly alter maize height, leaf area index or grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventionally tillede0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index and grain yielde0
Comparator
zero‐tillage treatmentse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in plant height, leaf area index and grain yield between the conventionally tilled and zero‐tillage treatments were not significant at P < 0.05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch increased grain yield by 23–46% during drier seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulched plotse0
Outcome
out‐yieldede0
Direction
out‐yieldede0
Value
23–46%e0
Qualifier
drier seasonse0
Comparator
unmulched plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mulched plots out‐yielded the unmulched plots by 23–46% during the drier seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum grain yield in tilled‐mulched plots occurred at 123 kg N ha −1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tilled‐mulchede0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
123e0
Qualifier
kg N ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yields occurred at 123, 139, 130 and 142 kg N ha −1 on the tilled‐mulched, tilled‐unmulched, untilled‐mulched and untilled‐unmulched plots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency was highest in tilled‐mulched plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
tilled‐mulchede0
Outcome
Nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
32.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen use efficiency (grain yield per kg N applied) decreased in the order tilled‐mulched (32.6) > untilled‐mulched (30.9) > untilled‐unmulched (27.8) > tilled‐unmulched (22.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unmulched plots had higher maximum soil temperature than mulched plots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
unmulchede0
Outcome
maximum soil temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mulched plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For each tillage treatment maximum soil temperature was higher and moisture retained at 2 and 10 days after saturation lower on the unmulched than mulched plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unmulched plots retained less moisture after saturation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
unmulchede0
Outcome
moisture retainede0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
mulched plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For each tillage treatment maximum soil temperature was higher and moisture retained at 2 and 10 days after saturation lower on the unmulched than mulched plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untilled‐mulched plots had the most residual organic carbon and total N.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
untilled‐mulched plotse0
Outcome
residual organic carbon and total Ne0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The untilled‐mulched plots had the highest contents of residual organic carbon and total N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.