Paper · 2005 · Applied Engineering in Agriculture

EFFECT OF ANNUAL, BIENNIAL, AND TRIENNIAL IN-ROW SUBSOILING ON SOIL COMPACTION AND COTTON YIELD IN SOUTHEASTERN U.S. SILT LOAM SOILS

R. L. Raper; E. B. Schwab; K. S. Balkcom; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

For those soils that require deep tillage to alleviate soil compaction, subsoiling can be an expensive andtime-consuming tillage event. Alternative tillage methods are needed which conserve natural resources without sacrificingcotton yields. An experiment was conducted in the Tennessee Valley region of north Alabama to determine how frequentlydeep tillage is needed to alleviate soil compaction problems in these soils. Three different subsoilers (an in-row subsoiler andtwo bentleg subsoilers) were tested against a no-till treatment to determine if differences in crop productivity or soil conditioncould be detected. Annual subsoiling resulted in reduced bulk density compared to biennial subsoiling, triennial subsoiling,or no subsoiling. Reductions in draft force were also found for annual subsoiling. However, cotton yield results over a two-yearperiod from tillage three-years previous, two-years previous, and one year previous found no differences.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual subsoiling reduced bulk density relative to biennial, triennial, and no subsoiling.

Treatment
Annual subsoilinge0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
biennial subsoiling, triennial subsoiling,or no subsoilinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Annual subsoiling resulted in reduced bulk density compared to biennial subsoiling, triennial subsoiling,or no subsoiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–744 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual subsoiling reduced draft force.

Treatment
annual subsoilinge0
Outcome
draft forcee0
Direction
Reductionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reductions in draft force were also found for annual subsoiling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield did not differ among tillage one, two, or three years previously over two years.

Treatment
tillage three-years previous, two-years previous, and one year previouse0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
no differencese0
Qualifier
over a two-yearperiode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton yield results over a two-yearperiod from tillage three-years previous, two-years previous, and one year previous found no differences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–960 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

tillage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 113 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 113 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.