Paper · 2000 · Agronomy Journal

Effects of Light, Growth Media, and Seedling Orientation on Bioassays of Alfalfa Autotoxicity

Sang‐Uk Chon; John H. Coutts; C. Jerry Nelson

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
76
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Most assessments of allelopathy involve bioassays. Our objective was to improve the sensitivity of an alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling bioassay for evaluating genetic tolerance to autotoxic leaf extracts. In a petri dish assay on imbibed seed, light inhibited hypocotyl elongation of controls and increased root elongation. Root growth was sensitive to the autotoxin in both light and darkness. An agar medium gave better root growth of controls and lower standard errors than did filter paper when petri dishes were placed on edge to encourage downward root growth or were placed flat where roots grew laterally. Hypocotyl growth was not very sensitive to the autotoxic chemical(s) on either agar or paper medium when the plate was flat, because the hypocotyl arched upward to escape contact with the extract. Hypocotyl growth was sensitive in a rolled paper towel treatment held vertically because the hypocotyl remained in continuous contact with the extract. On agar plates placed flat, 50% inhibition of root length occurred at an extract concentration that was about 8% of that needed for 50% inhibition of germination at 36 and 48 h. Root growth was stimulated up to 15% above controls at very low concentrations of leaf extract. Root length at 120 h was the best indicator of autotoxic effects of alfalfa leaf extracts. We evaluated 17 germplasms and three cultivars of alfalfa for root growth response to the autotoxic chemical and found a twofold range ( P < 0.05) in tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light inhibited hypocotyl elongation in controls.

Taxon
controlse0
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
hypocotyl elongatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“light inhibited hypocotyl elongation of controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light increased root elongation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
lighte0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light inhibited hypocotyl elongation of controls and increased root elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–329 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth was sensitive to autotoxin under light and darkness.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
autotoxine0
Outcome
Root growth was sensitive to the autotoxine0
Qualifier
both light and darknesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth was sensitive to the autotoxin in both light and darkness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–400 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–140 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar yielded better control root growth than filter paper.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
agar mediume0
Outcome
root growth of controlse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
filter papere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An agar medium gave better root growth of controls and lower standard errors than did filter paper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–140 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agar gave lower standard errors than filter paper.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
standard errorse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
filter papere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An agar medium gave better root growth of controls and lower standard errors than did filter paper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–140 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat plates made hypocotyl growth relatively insensitive to autotoxic chemicals on agar or paper.

Taxon
Hypocotyle0
Outcome
Hypocotyl growth was not very sensitivee0
Comparator
agar or paper mediume0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Hypocotyl growth was not very sensitive to the autotoxic chemical(s) on either agar or paper medium when the plate was flat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–743 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vertical rolled paper towels gave a sensitive hypocotyl response.

Taxon
Hypocotyle0
Outcome
Hypocotyl growth was sensitivee0
Comparator
rolled paper towel treatment held verticallye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Hypocotyl growth was sensitive in a rolled paper towel treatment held vertically because the hypocotyl remained in continuous contact with the extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–968 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On flat agar, root-length inhibition required about 8% of the extract concentration needed for comparable germination inhibition.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
50% inhibition of root lengthe0
Value
about 8%e0
Qualifier
at 36 and 48 he0
Comparator
50% inhibition of germinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On agar plates placed flat, 50% inhibition of root length occurred at an extract concentration that was about 8% of that needed for 50% inhibition of germination at 36 and 48 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low leaf-extract concentrations stimulated root growth by up to 15% over controls.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
very low concentrations of leaf extracte0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth was stimulated up to 15% above controls at very low concentrations of leaf extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1242 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–140 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length at 120 h was the best indicator of autotoxicity.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Outcome
Root length at 120 he0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
autotoxic effects of alfalfa leaf extractse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length at 120 h was the best indicator of autotoxic effects of alfalfa leaf extracts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa germplasm and cultivars showed a twofold range in autotoxic tolerance.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Material
17 germplasms and three cultivarse0
Outcome
tolerancee0
Value
twofold rangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“17 germplasms and three cultivars of alfalfa for root growth response to the autotoxic chemical and found a twofold range ( P < 0.05) in tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1494 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

101 papers: 42 positive, 59 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

light · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 18 positive, 10 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.