Paper · 1992 · Agronomy Journal

Increase in Drought Resistance of Cotton Seedlings Treated with Mepiquat Chloride

X. Xu; H. M. Taylor

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Under rainfed conditions, plant establishment is often low in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) because of water limitations. Increasing drought resistance of cotton seedlings by accelerating root growth thus has important, practical implications. Much research has been devoted to modifying plant root systems for more effective use of soil water, but successful results are few. We studied the effects of mepiquat chloride (MC; 1,1‐dimethylpiperidinium chloride) on drought resistance of cotton seedlings. Well‐watered seedlings were irrigated with mepiquat chloride (0‐40 mg kg −1 ), and then subjected to progressively greater water stress. Treatment with MC accelerated root growth and increased water absorption, especially at greater soil depths. The seedlings treated with MC were turgid longer and wilted less than the drought controls. In another series of experiments seeds were treated (0‐4000 mg kg −1 ) and arising plants were assessed for growth and survival in both well‐watered and water‐stress conditions. A seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1 gave shorter and more compact shoots, did not affect leaf area, but increased specific leaf weight and chlorophyll content. Seed treatment with 500 mg kg −1 MC also gave the greatest enhancement of root growth, water extraction from deep soil layers, and survival of stressed seedlings. These results suggested a potential for using MC to modify root patterns and increase drought resistance of cotton seedlings. Field tests of seed treatments with MC should be conducted to determine whether seedling survival is enhanced under natural drought‐stressed conditions. The responses of different cotton varieties to MC treatment also should be investigated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC treatment accelerated root growth of cotton seedlings.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
MCe1
Outcome
root growthe1
Direction
acceleratede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment with MC accelerated root growth and increased water absorption, especially at greater soil depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC treatment increased water absorption by cotton seedlings, especially at greater soil depths.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
MCe1
Outcome
water absorptione1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
especially at greater soil depthse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatment with MC accelerated root growth and increased water absorption, especially at greater soil depths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC-treated cotton seedlings stayed turgid longer than drought controls under water stress.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
MCe2
Outcome
turgide2
Direction
longere2
Comparator
drought controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seedlings treated with MC were turgid longer and wilted less than the drought controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC-treated cotton seedlings wilted less than drought controls.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
MCe2
Outcome
wiltede2
Direction
lesse2
Comparator
drought controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seedlings treated with MC were turgid longer and wilted less than the drought controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 500 mg kg −1 MC gave shorter and more compact cotton shoots.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1e3
Outcome
shootse3
Direction
shorter and more compacte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“A seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1 gave shorter and more compact shoots, did not affect leaf area, but increased specific leaf weight and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 500 mg kg −1 MC did not affect cotton leaf area.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1e3
Outcome
leaf areae3
Direction
did not affecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“A seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1 gave shorter and more compact shoots, did not affect leaf area, but increased specific leaf weight and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 500 mg kg −1 MC increased specific leaf weight and chlorophyll content of cotton.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1e3
Outcome
specific leaf weight and chlorophyll contente3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“A seed treatment of 500 mg kg −1 gave shorter and more compact shoots, did not affect leaf area, but increased specific leaf weight and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with 500 mg kg −1 MC gave the greatest enhancement of root growth, water extraction from deep soil layers and survival of stressed cotton seedlings.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
500 mg kg −1 MCe4
Outcome
root growth, water extraction from deep soil layers, and survival of stressed seedlingse4
Direction
greatest enhancemente4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seed treatment with 500 mg kg −1 MC also gave the greatest enhancement of root growth, water extraction from deep soil layers, and survival of stressed seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1349 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Using MC to modify root patterns and increase drought resistance of cotton seedlings is a potential approach.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
increase drought resistance of cotton seedlingse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“These results suggested a potential for using MC to modify root patterns and increase drought resistance of cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1475 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.