Paper · 2012 · Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection

Estimation of economic injury level ofAphis craccivoraKoch. (Homoptera: Aphididae) infesting faba bean in new reclaimed area

W.L. Abdou; E.A. Abdel-Hakim; N.Y. Salem; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This work was based on field screening procedure to detect the population density of Aphis craccivora for two successive seasons (2004–2005) and (2005–2006) to emphasis the relation between the economic injury level (EIL) and yield loss. Results obtained showed that the equilibrium position (steady point) during the first and second season was 9.06 and 3.32 individuals/five leaflets, respectively, while the injury level was 3.4 and 1.16 individuals/leaflets. When the bean plant was subjected to three successive insecticidal applications during the early growing, season is sufficient to decrease the yield loss significantly (yield capacity 21.43 Ard./fed.) with comparing to untreated plant (14.98 Ard./fed.), while the plants exposure for one treatment was 17.36 Ard./fed. The EIL was 8.6 individual of aphids/plant depending on the market price of bean and control cost during the season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first season equilibrium position of Aphis craccivora was 9.06 individuals/five leaflets.

Taxon
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat1
Outcome
equilibrium positione0
Value
9.06e0
Qualifier
firste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · TaxonSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the equilibrium position (steady point) during the first and second season was 9.06 and 3.32 individuals/five leaflets, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second season equilibrium position of Aphis craccivora was 3.32 individuals/five leaflets.

Taxon
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat0
Outcome
equilibrium positione0
Value
3.32 individuals/five leafletse0
Qualifier
second seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · TaxonSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the equilibrium position (steady point) during the first and second season was 9.06 and 3.32 individuals/five leaflets, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first season Aphis craccivora injury level was 3.4 individuals/leaflets.

Taxon
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat0
Outcome
injury levele0
Value
3.4e0
Qualifier
firste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · TaxonSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the injury level was 3.4 and 1.16 individuals/leaflets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“the equilibrium position (steady point) during the first and second season was 9.06 and 3.32 individuals/five leaflets, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–399 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second season Aphis craccivora injury level was 1.16 individuals/leaflets.

Taxon
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat0
Outcome
injury levele0
Value
1.16 individuals/leafletse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · TaxonSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the injury level was 3.4 and 1.16 individuals/leaflets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three early insecticide applications significantly reduced yield loss in faba bean compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
three successive insecticidal applicationse0
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat1pest
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
21.43 Ard./fed.e0
Qualifier
14.98 Ard./fed.e0
Comparator
untreated plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three successive insecticidal applications during the early growing, season is sufficient to decrease the yield loss significantly (yield capacity 21.43 Ard./fed.) with comparing to untreated plant (14.98 Ard./fed.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One insecticide treatment gave bean yield capacity of 17.36 Ard./fed.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
one treatmente0
Interactor
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat1pest
Outcome
plants exposuree0
Value
17.36 Ard./fed.e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · InteractorSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the plants exposure for one treatment was 17.36 Ard./fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–780 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The economic injury level for aphids was 8.6 individuals per plant, based on bean price and control cost.

Taxon
Aphis craccivoraAphis craccivorat0
Outcome
EILe0
Value
8.6 individual of aphids/plante0
Qualifier
market price of bean and control coste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis craccivora
Aphis craccivora · TaxonSimon Hinkley & Ken Walker Museum Victoria · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EIL was 8.6 individual of aphids/plant depending on the market price of bean and control cost during the season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis craccivora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–54 · show in text ↑

insecticide · Aphis craccivora · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.